8base.com vs ScyllaDB

Compare 8base.com and ScyllaDB on pricing, features, platforms, and ratings — both Databases tools, freemium vs Open source core with paid Enterprise…

At a Glance

 8base.comScyllaDB
Primary categoryDatabasesDatabases
RatingNot documentedNot documented
Pricing modelfreemiumOpen source core with paid Enterprise (self-managed) and fully managed Cloud tiers
Starting priceFree plan available; paid plans start at 25 USD per monthFree (open source); ScyllaDB Cloud and Enterprise pricing available on request
Free planNot documentedNot documented
Free trialNot documentedNot documented
PlatformsNot documentedNot documented
Team collaborationNot documentedNot documented
AI featuresNot documentedNot documented
Public APINot documentedYes

Pricing Compared

Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.

8base.com

Free — $0 monthly
Developer — $25/month monthly
Professional — $50/month per developer (minimum 3 developers) monthly
Enterprise — $75/month per developer (minimum 10 developers) monthly

ScyllaDB

Open Source — Free N/A
Enterprise — Custom quote Contact sales
Cloud Standard — Usage-based, contact sales Hourly resource billing
Cloud Professional — Usage-based, contact sales Hourly resource billing
Cloud Premium — Usage-based, contact sales Hourly resource billing

Pros & Cons

8base.com

Pros

  • Per-project pricing avoids the per-end-user cost trap common with other low-code backend tools
  • GraphQL-first architecture gives front-end teams a flexible, single API for data access
  • Free plan is usable for real prototypes, not just a limited demo
  • Compliance certifications (HIPAA, GDPR, SOC 2) available for regulated industries on paid tiers
  • Enterprise tier supports self-hosting and SSO for larger organizations

Cons

  • Professional and Enterprise plans require a minimum number of developer seats, which can raise the effective entry cost for small teams
  • GraphQL-first design may require a learning curve for teams used to REST-based backends
  • Public information about company size and recent funding is limited
  • Less brand recognition than larger BaaS competitors such as Firebase or Supabase

ScyllaDB

Pros

  • Consistently cited by users as significantly lower latency than Cassandra under heavy load
  • DynamoDB-compatible API can meaningfully reduce cloud database costs for high-throughput workloads
  • Free, actively maintained open source edition with no licensing cost for self-managed use
  • Fully managed Cloud option removes operational burden for teams that do not want to self-host
  • Drop-in compatibility with existing Cassandra tooling and drivers eases migration

Cons

  • No public flat-rate pricing for Enterprise or Cloud tiers, requiring a sales conversation to get a quote
  • Operating a self-managed cluster still requires distributed systems expertise
  • Smaller ecosystem and third-party tooling compared to long-established Cassandra or DynamoDB
  • AGPL licensing on the open source edition can raise compliance questions for some organizations
  • Migrating fully off Cassandra or DynamoDB still requires careful testing despite compatibility layers

Use Cases

8base.com

  • Launching an MVP quickly — Indie developers and startups use 8base's auto-generated backend to skip building infrastructure and focus on the front end.
  • Building client applications at an agency — Consultancies use 8base's per-project pricing to deliver multiple client backends without per-end-user cost overruns.
  • Powering internal or SaaS tools at a company — Product teams use 8base's compliance features and role-based permissions to build internal tools or SaaS products with regulatory requirements.

ScyllaDB

  • Real-time messaging and notification systems — Applications like chat and notification platforms use ScyllaDB for its ability to sustain very high write throughput with predictable low latency at scale.
  • Migrating off DynamoDB to control costs — Teams facing high or unpredictable DynamoDB bills use ScyllaDB's Alternator API to move workloads to self-managed or ScyllaDB Cloud infrastructure without a full data layer rewrite.
  • Replacing Cassandra for lower latency — Organizations running large Cassandra clusters that experience garbage collection pauses or tail latency issues evaluate ScyllaDB as a wire-compatible, lower-latency replacement.

Read the full 8base.com review · Read the full ScyllaDB review