Appinvento vs Bildr vs Draftbit: Which Is Right for You in 2026?
Of the three, Appinvento and Draftbit are the live, comparable options - both let non-experts or developers visually build apps with a real backend, but they…
Best for: Developers who want a free-to-start, AI-assisted, code-exportable app builder built on Supabase for cross-platform apps.
At a Glance
Appinvento
Bildr
Draftbit
Primary category
No-Code
No-Code
No-Code
Rating
Not documented
Not documented
Not documented
Pricing model
freemium
subscription
Freemium
Starting price
$99/month
Not documented
Free
Free plan
Not documented
Not documented
Yes
Free trial
Not documented
Not documented
Not documented
Platforms
Not documented
Not documented
Web, iOS, Android
Team collaboration
Not documented
Not documented
Not documented
AI features
Not documented
Not documented
Yes
Public API
Not documented
Not documented
Yes
Standout Differences
Bildr no longer exists as a viable choice
Bildr shut down its service on May 25, 2026. Any comparison against Appinvento or Draftbit today is really about migration risk and platform longevity, not feature parity - teams that built on Bildr had to move off it.
Bildr
Appinvento bundles backend generation into the price
Appinvento is explicitly positioned around generating a full backend alongside the visual app, with a published starting price of $99/month - a more concrete, budget-plannable entry point than Draftbit's freemium model or Bildr's now-defunct subscription.
Appinvento
Draftbit is the developer-leaning, AI-native option
Draftbit pairs visual design with AI coding agents and Supabase as its backend, and it explicitly supports code export - a combination aimed at developers who want to keep an escape hatch into real code rather than a fully closed no-code system.
Draftbit
Free entry points differ in scope
Draftbit's starting price is listed simply as free under a freemium model, giving it the lowest-risk trial path of the two live options, while Appinvento's freemium model still lists $99/month as its starting paid price, suggesting a more limited free tier.
Appinvento, Draftbit
Feature-by-Feature
Pricing & Plans
Feature
Appinvento
Bildr
Draftbit
Free tier available
Available
Not documented
Available
Published starting price
Available
Unavailable
Available
Core Capability
Feature
Appinvento
Bildr
Draftbit
Full-stack app with auto-generated backend
Available
Available
Limited
Cross-platform mobile + web output
Available
Not documented
Available
AI-assisted code generation
Available
Not documented
Available
Code export
Not documented
Not documented
Available
Status
Feature
Appinvento
Bildr
Draftbit
Actively operating as of 2026
Available
Unavailable
Available
Pricing Compared
Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.
Appinvento
Free — $0 monthly
Pro — $99/month monthly
Enterprise — Custom quote annual (typical)
Bildr
No individual plan breakdown documented yet.
Draftbit
Free — $0/month free
Standard — $12/month monthly
Pro — $24/month monthly
Team — $120/month monthly
Pros & Cons
Appinvento
Pros
Generates a real backend rather than locking users into a purely visual, non-portable system.
Free plan is usable for real prototyping with unlimited API routes.
14-day free trial with no credit card required lowers the barrier to testing the platform.
Company also offers custom development services for teams that outgrow the no-code platform.
Long operating history since 2013 suggests some staying power in the no-code space.
Cons
Public information on company size, funding, and customer base is limited.
Free plan is capped at 3 projects and 5 tables, which may be restrictive for anything beyond a prototype.
Pro plan pricing at 99 dollars per month may be a jump for solo founders compared to some no-code competitors.
Turing-complete no-code platforms can still involve a learning curve for genuinely complex applications.
Bildr
Pros
Enabled non-developers to build full-stack web applications without writing code
Combined visual UI design, logic, and a database in a single unified platform
Offered a genuinely usable free tier for learning and prototyping before it shut down
Provided a data export option and direct migration outreach when the company wound down
Included niche capabilities like Web3 templates and a self-hosting option for enterprise customers
Cons
The company shut down entirely on May 25, 2026, so the product is no longer available to new or existing users
All hosted projects and customer data were deleted roughly 30 days after the shutdown date
Former users had to migrate to other platforms or rebuild applications elsewhere with no ongoing support
As a visual no-code builder, it carried the typical flexibility and performance trade-offs of that category while active
Historic plans, including the one-time Studio Pass, are no longer purchasable or usable in any capacity
Draftbit
Pros
Combines visual editing, AI code generation, and real code export in one workflow
Free plan is usable for small projects with real AI agent access, not just a demo
Built-in Supabase integration removes the need for separate backend setup
Y Combinator-backed with a long operating history, founded in 2017
Full code export avoids vendor lock-in compared to fully proprietary no-code tools
Cons
Independent reviews consistently describe customer support as weak or slow
Credit-based AI usage means heavy users can hit monthly limits on lower plans
Platform has changed direction significantly, from pure no-code to an AI-agent sandbox, which may require relearning workflows for long-time users
Team plan pricing jumps sharply from Pro ($24) to Team ($120)
Use Cases
Choose Appinvento: Startups and non-developers who want a no-code builder that auto-generates a full backend, at a published $99/month starting price.
Choose Bildr: No one currently - the service shut down on May 25, 2026; relevant only as context for teams migrating off it.
Choose Draftbit: Developers who want a free-to-start, AI-assisted, code-exportable app builder built on Supabase for cross-platform apps.
Appinvento
Startup MVP validation — A non-technical founder uses Appinvento to build a working prototype app with a real backend to validate a product idea before hiring developers.
Internal business tool building — A small business builds an internal tool with authentication and data tables using Appinvento's no-code platform instead of commissioning custom software.
Custom app development handoff — A company starts with a no-code prototype on Appinvento and later engages Appinvento's development services team to build a fully custom version.
Bildr
Building Internal Business Tools — Non-technical teams used Bildr to visually design internal dashboards and workflow tools connected to its built-in database.
Launching SaaS Products Without a Dev Team — Founders without engineering resources used Bildr to design, add logic to, and publish customer-facing SaaS applications on custom domains.
Prototyping Web3 Applications — Teams used Bildr's Web3 templates to prototype blockchain-connected interfaces without writing front-end code from scratch.
Draftbit
MVP app prototyping — Quickly scaffold a working mobile app prototype using AI agents and a visual editor.
Cross-platform app publishing — Build one app and publish it to iOS, Android, and web from a single project.
AI-assisted feature development — Use AI agent chat to add or modify app screens and logic without writing every line of code manually.
Team app development with Supabase backend — Collaborate on an app project with multiple editors sharing a Supabase-backed backend.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Bildr still a usable option in 2026?
No. Bildr shut down its service on May 25, 2026, so it's no longer available to build on or sign up for. If you're comparing tools today, Appinvento and Draftbit are the two live options in this trio; Bildr is only relevant if you need context on migrating away from it.
What should I use instead if I was building on Bildr?
Between the remaining two, it depends on your priorities: Appinvento offers a full auto-generated backend with a clear $99/month starting price, aimed at startups and non-developers, while Draftbit offers AI-assisted, code-exportable builds on Supabase aimed more at developers who want to eventually own the code. Neither is a drop-in Bildr replacement, so plan for a real migration rather than a like-for-like swap.
Which is cheaper to start, Appinvento or Draftbit?
Draftbit, based on the data available - its starting price is listed as free under a freemium model. Appinvento is also freemium but its published starting price for paid plans is $99/month, suggesting its free tier is more limited than its paid offering.
Does Draftbit let me export real code, or am I locked into the platform?
Draftbit is explicitly described as supporting code export as part of its AI-assisted, visual build process, which gives it more of an escape hatch than a fully closed no-code tool. This is a meaningful differentiator versus platforms that don't document code-export capability, such as Appinvento in the data available here.
Is Appinvento's full-backend generation unique among these three?
Among the two currently operating tools, yes - Appinvento is specifically described as generating a full backend automatically alongside the app. Draftbit takes a different approach, integrating with Supabase as its backend rather than generating one from scratch. Bildr's backend approach is no longer relevant since the service has shut down.