Compare archivarix and getsheetable on pricing, features, platforms, and ratings — both CMS tools, Pay-per-use credit-balance pricing: roughly $0.25 for a…
At a Glance
archivarix
getsheetable
Primary category
CMS
CMS
Rating
Not documented
Not documented
Pricing model
Pay-per-use credit-balance pricing: roughly $0.25 for a Wayback Machine restoration up to 200 files, then about $10 per additional 1,000 files, with live-site downloads billed on a similar tiered file-count basis. No flat monthly subscription tiers are published.
Pricing is not publicly disclosed on the homepage; a dedicated Pricing section exists on the site. Visit getsheetable.com for current terms.
Starting price
Not documented
Not documented
Free plan
Not documented
Not documented
Free trial
Not documented
Not documented
Platforms
Web
Not documented
Team collaboration
Not documented
Not documented
AI features
Not documented
Not documented
Public API
Yes
Yes
Pricing Compared
Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.
archivarix
No individual plan breakdown documented yet.
getsheetable
No individual plan breakdown documented yet.
Pros & Cons
archivarix
Pros
Can rebuild a working copy of a site purely from Wayback Machine archives, useful when the original site and its files are gone
Pay-per-use pricing means occasional users aren't locked into a recurring subscription
Bundled CMS and export options (WordPress/Joomla-compatible, static HTML, JSON/CSV/XML) give flexibility in what you do with the recovered content
Built-in optimization (image compression, minification, link fixing, tracker/ad removal) saves manual cleanup after a restore
Cons
Detailed subscription/plan pricing isn't published on the marketing site — costs are pay-per-file via an account balance, which makes upfront budgeting harder
Wayback Machine restorations are only as complete as what the Internet Archive actually captured, so some pages, assets, or dynamic functionality may not recover cleanly
The bundled Archivarix CMS is a niche, proprietary system rather than a mainstream platform, which may limit long-term support/ecosystem options
getsheetable
Pros
No Google API key setup is required to connect a sheet, per the product's own marketing copy — lowering the technical barrier for non-developers.
Very small frontend footprint (about 10KB, per the site's own claim), which should have minimal impact on WordPress page-load performance.
Purpose-built for WordPress specifically, so it should integrate directly with the CMS most small-business sites already run.
Maintains a dedicated documentation site with an FAQ page and a YouTube tutorials channel, suggesting ongoing support content beyond the marketing site.
Cons
The crawl did not surface concrete pricing or plan details, even though a Pricing section exists in the site navigation.
Detailed feature information beyond the headline claims was not captured, so capabilities like sorting, filtering, or styling can't be confirmed.
The site's About Us page returned a 404 error at crawl time, leaving no visible company background, team, or trust signals.
It's tied specifically to WordPress, so it isn't usable as a standalone tool on other platforms based on available evidence.