CatchDoms vs CatchJS.com vs cDox: Which Is Right for You in 2026?

CatchDoms, CatchJS, and cDox solve three unrelated problems - finding valuable expired domains, catching JavaScript errors in production, and collaborating on…

CatchDoms

Freemium with tiered paid subscriptions (Free, Pro, Authority, Authority plus) · From EUR 39/month (Pro plan billed annually; EUR 89/month billed monthly, or EUR 468/year)

Best for: Domain investors, SEO professionals, and entrepreneurs who need aggregated, SEO-enriched data on expired and auction domains without manually checking a dozen sites.

CatchJS.com

Tiered monthly subscription based on error volume and monitored URLs, with an annual billing discount · From $44/month (Development plan, billed annually; $49/month billed monthly)

Best for: Developers and Shopify merchants who want a sub-2KB script for error tracking, Core Web Vitals monitoring, and privacy-friendly analytics.

cDox

Freemium subscription · From Free (Pro plan available at $8/month or $70/year)

Best for: Writers, journalists, researchers, and privacy-conscious teams who need real-time document and spreadsheet collaboration with data kept out of AI training pipelines.

At a Glance

 CatchDomsCatchJS.comcDox
Primary categoryAutomationAutomationAutomation
RatingNot documentedNot documentedNot documented
Pricing modelFreemium with tiered paid subscriptions (Free, Pro, Authority, Authority plus)Tiered monthly subscription based on error volume and monitored URLs, with an annual billing discountFreemium subscription
Starting priceEUR 39/month (Pro plan billed annually; EUR 89/month billed monthly, or EUR 468/year)$44/month (Development plan, billed annually; $49/month billed monthly)Free (Pro plan available at $8/month or $70/year)
Free planNot documentedNot documentedNot documented
Free trialNot documentedNot documentedNot documented
PlatformsNot documentedNot documentedNot documented
Team collaborationNot documentedNot documentedNot documented
AI featuresNot documentedNot documentedNot documented
Public APINot documentedNot documentedNot documented

Standout Differences

Small, founder-led teams behind all three

CatchDoms is built and operated by a single bootstrapped founder, Samir Belabbes; CatchJS is a small Trondheim, Norway-based company founded in 2018 around a developer-first philosophy; cDox is built by BFH Labs Inc., a Canadian company. None of the three is a venture-scale operation competing on breadth of features.

CatchDoms, CatchJS.com, cDox

Free tiers work very differently

CatchDoms' free tier shows a limited set of visible domains, cDox's free tier gives 50MB of storage and up to 3 public links, and CatchJS skips a free tier entirely in favor of a 14-day free trial before its Development plan kicks in at $44/month.

CatchDoms, cDox, CatchJS.com

Data jurisdiction only matters for one of these

cDox is built explicitly around Canadian and Quebec data sovereignty, hosting all data on bare-metal servers in Montreal with an explicit promise that content is never used to train AI models. Neither CatchDoms nor CatchJS makes a comparable jurisdictional or AI-training claim about their own data handling.

cDox

AI-agent access is a CatchDoms differentiator

CatchDoms offers both a REST API and a dedicated Model Context Protocol (MCP) server, letting AI assistants like Claude or Cursor query expired-domain data conversationally. cDox exposes a REST API for document access, while CatchJS's product is itself delivered as a lightweight script rather than a queryable API.

CatchDoms, cDox, CatchJS.com

Feature-by-Feature

Pricing & Plans

FeatureCatchDomsCatchJS.comcDox
Free tier availableAvailableUnavailableAvailable
Annual billing discount vs monthlyAvailableAvailableAvailable
Discount for nonprofitsNot documentedNot documentedNot documented

Core Capability

FeatureCatchDomsCatchJS.comcDox
Expired/auction domain discovery & SEO metricsAvailableUnavailableUnavailable
JavaScript error tracking with stack tracesUnavailableAvailableUnavailable
Real-time document/spreadsheet collaborationUnavailableUnavailableAvailable
Web performance metrics (LCP, CLS, FID)UnavailableAvailableUnavailable

Developer & API Access

FeatureCatchDomsCatchJS.comcDox
REST API for developersAvailableNot documentedAvailable
MCP server / conversational AI-assistant accessAvailableUnavailableUnavailable
Dedicated Shopify appUnavailableAvailableUnavailable

Pricing Compared

Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.

CatchDoms

Free — $0 Free
Pro — EUR 39/month billed annually (EUR 468/year), or EUR 89/month billed monthly Monthly or annual

CatchJS.com

Development — $44/month billed annually, or $49/month billed monthly Monthly or annual
Production — $79/month billed annually, or $89/month billed monthly Monthly or annual
Enterprise — $449/month billed annually, or $499/month billed monthly Monthly or annual

cDox

Free — $0 Free
Pro — $8/month or $70/year Monthly or annual

Pros & Cons

CatchDoms

Pros

  • Consolidates dozens of auction platforms and SEO metric lookups into a single searchable tool
  • Includes both a REST API and an MCP server, unusual and useful for developers and AI-assisted workflows
  • Automatic SEO enrichment (Trust Flow, Citation Flow, Domain Authority, backlinks) saves significant manual research time
  • Entry-level Pro pricing (around EUR 39/month annualized) is accessible compared to enterprise domain intelligence tools
  • Built by a founder with direct domain-investing experience, so the workflow is designed around real practitioner needs

Cons

  • As a solo, bootstrapped project, long-term company stability and support capacity are less certain than with a larger vendor
  • Exact founding date and company details are not formally published, limiting transparency for buyers doing due diligence
  • Full pricing for the higher Authority and Authority plus tiers is not consistently published and requires checking the live pricing page
  • Free tier is limited to a small number of visible domains, making the paid Pro plan necessary for serious use
  • Coverage depends on the specific auction platforms integrated, so it may not include every registrar a buyer cares about

CatchJS.com

Pros

  • Extremely small script footprint minimizes impact on page load and Core Web Vitals scores
  • Combines error tracking, performance monitoring, and simple analytics in one lightweight tool
  • Straightforward, transparent per-tier pricing without complex seat-based licensing
  • Dedicated Shopify app extends usability to non-developer e-commerce store owners
  • 14-day free trial available on every plan with no long-term commitment required

Cons

  • Smaller company and ecosystem than major competitors like Sentry, so integrations and community resources are more limited
  • Pricing is comparatively high relative to logged-error volume once beyond the Development tier's 1,000-error allowance
  • Feature depth (e.g., source-map deobfuscation, release tracking, advanced alerting rules) may be less extensive than larger dedicated error-tracking platforms
  • Best suited to smaller sites; the top Enterprise tier's 1,000,000-error allowance may still be limiting for very high-traffic applications
  • Limited public information on the company itself (team size, funding) makes long-term vendor risk harder to assess

cDox

Pros

  • Explicit, publicly stated commitment that user content is never used for AI training or data mining
  • Data hosted under a specific national jurisdiction (currently Canada) on independent bare-metal servers rather than a large multinational cloud provider
  • Affordable Pro tier pricing at $8/month or $70/year compared to many mainstream productivity suites
  • Multi-format export (Markdown, PDF, Word, CSV) avoids proprietary file lock-in
  • Clear focus on privacy-sensitive professions like journalism, healthcare, and research gives it a distinct, differentiated value proposition

Cons

  • As an early-stage company, long-term business stability and feature parity with major competitors like Google Docs are unproven
  • Free tier storage (50MB) and public link limit (3) are quite restrictive for anything beyond light personal use
  • Currently hosted only in Canada, so the multi-country data residency roadmap (through 2027) is not yet available
  • Smaller feature set and integration ecosystem compared to mature, decades-old productivity suites
  • Limited public information on the company's security certifications or compliance posture for regulated industries like healthcare

Use Cases

Choose CatchDoms: Domain investors, SEO professionals, and entrepreneurs who need aggregated, SEO-enriched data on expired and auction domains without manually checking a dozen sites.
Choose CatchJS.com: Developers and Shopify merchants who want a sub-2KB script for error tracking, Core Web Vitals monitoring, and privacy-friendly analytics.
Choose cDox: Writers, journalists, researchers, and privacy-conscious teams who need real-time document and spreadsheet collaboration with data kept out of AI training pipelines.

CatchDoms

  • Finding expired domains with strong backlink profiles — Domain investors use CatchDoms's automatic SEO enrichment to quickly identify expiring domains with valuable existing backlinks and authority metrics.
  • Sourcing aged domains for new SEO projects — SEO professionals use the aged ccTLD regfee database and filtering tools to find registrable aged domains as a foundation for new content or affiliate sites.
  • Automating domain research through AI assistants and APIs — Developers use the CatchDoms REST API or MCP server to pull expired-domain data directly into custom scripts or AI coding assistants for automated sourcing workflows.

CatchJS.com

  • Lightweight error monitoring for performance-sensitive sites — Teams that care deeply about page-weight and Core Web Vitals use CatchJS's sub-2KB script to add error tracking without hurting load performance.
  • Shopify storefront error monitoring — Store owners use the Error Tracking with CatchJS Shopify app to catch JavaScript errors that could disrupt checkout or browsing on their storefront.
  • Simple, privacy-friendly usage and performance insight — Small teams use CatchJS's built-in analytics and Core Web Vitals tracking as a lightweight alternative to running separate analytics and performance monitoring tools.

cDox

  • Privacy-conscious writing and journalism — Writers and journalists use cDox to draft and store sensitive material with a guarantee it will not be mined for AI training or extracted for other purposes.
  • Client-confidential documentation for healthcare and therapy practices — Therapists and healthcare providers use cDox's jurisdiction-specific hosting and no-AI-training policy for notes and documentation involving client confidentiality.
  • Data-sovereign collaboration for nonprofits and researchers — Nonprofits and academic researchers use cDox to collaborate on documents while keeping data under a specific national legal jurisdiction rather than a multinational cloud provider.

Frequently Asked Questions

Do CatchDoms, CatchJS, and cDox do the same thing?

No. CatchDoms discovers and scores expired/auction domains for domain investors and SEOs, CatchJS tracks JavaScript errors and web performance on a live site, and cDox is a privacy-focused document and spreadsheet collaboration tool. They're grouped here as a directory comparison, not as interchangeable options.

Which of these three is cheapest to start using?

cDox and CatchDoms both offer usable free tiers - cDox gives 50MB of storage and 3 public links free, CatchDoms shows a limited set of domains free. CatchJS has no free tier, only a 14-day trial before its Development plan starts at $44/month (billed annually).

Is CatchDoms or CatchJS better for a solo indie developer?

It depends on the job. CatchDoms is built for domain research and SEO due diligence - useful if you're buying or flipping domains. CatchJS is built for monitoring the health and performance of a website or app you already run. A developer could plausibly use both for entirely different reasons.

Does any of these integrate with AI assistants like Claude?

CatchDoms has a dedicated Model Context Protocol (MCP) server specifically so AI assistants such as Claude or Cursor can query its expired-domain database conversationally. Neither CatchJS nor cDox documents an equivalent MCP or AI-assistant integration.

Which of the three is the right choice if data privacy and jurisdiction are my main concern?

cDox, by a wide margin. It's built explicitly around Canadian and Quebec data sovereignty, hosts data on independent bare-metal servers in Montreal, and states that user content is never used to train AI models - a positioning neither CatchDoms nor CatchJS makes.

Read the full CatchDoms review · Read the full CatchJS.com review · Read the full cDox review