ColorTokens vs CookieYes vs Corgea: Which Is Right for You in 2026?

ColorTokens

Custom, quote-based enterprise pricing, generally licensed by protected workload, endpoint or environment; there is no published self-serve price list · From Not publicly disclosed - contact sales for a quote

Best for: Mid-market and enterprise organizations in healthcare, manufacturing, or finance that need to isolate workloads and stop lateral malware spread without re-architecting their network.

CookieYes

Freemium subscription, billed per domain based on pages scanned and monthly page views · From Free plan available; paid plans start at 10 USD per month per domain (Basic)

Best for: WordPress site owners, agencies, and small businesses that need GDPR/CCPA-compliant cookie banners and scanning without enterprise sales overhead.

Corgea

Per-developer monthly subscription with a free tier and a custom Enterprise plan · From Free (paid plans start at 39 USD per developer per month)

Best for: AppSec and engineering teams that want an AI-native alternative to traditional SAST tools, including code, dependency, container, and IaC scanning with auto-generated patches.

ColorTokens

No individual plan breakdown documented yet.

CookieYes

Corgea

ColorTokens

Pros

• Agent and agentless deployment options support legacy and OT systems that cannot run traditional security agents
• Managed service option (Xassure) lowers the barrier for teams without dedicated segmentation staff
• Purpose-built for ransomware lateral-movement containment, a specific and well-understood attack pattern
• Works across hybrid and multi-cloud environments without requiring network hardware changes
• AI-assisted policy recommendations reduce manual effort in writing segmentation rules
• Positioned as a focused specialist vendor rather than segmentation being a minor feature of a broader platform

Cons

• Pricing is not public, making it harder to budget or compare against competitors upfront
• Smaller company size than larger network security vendors may mean a narrower partner and integration ecosystem
• Initial policy discovery and tuning for complex environments can take significant time
• Primarily an enterprise-focused tool, less accessible for very small businesses
• Requires ongoing policy maintenance as applications and infrastructure change over time
• Limited independent, recent third-party benchmark data is publicly available

CookieYes

Pros

• Deep WordPress integration from its origins as the Cookie Law Info plugin
• Usable free tier for small blogs and personal sites
• Google-certified CMP with Consent Mode V2 and IAB TCF support
• Wide adoption with more than 1.5 million active installations
• Clear, published per-domain pricing across all tiers
• 14-day free trial on paid plans with no upfront charge

Cons

• Overage fees apply once page view limits are exceeded on Basic and Pro
• Removing CookieYes branding requires the top Ultimate tier
• Pricing is per domain, which can add up for agencies managing many client sites
• Advanced features like geo-targeting are gated behind Pro and above
• Exact company headcount is not publicly disclosed

Corgea

Pros

• Pairs vulnerability detection with an AI-generated fix rather than leaving remediation entirely to developers
• Genuinely usable free tier that includes the core scanning engine, not just a limited trial
• Broad coverage in one platform: SAST, logic/auth flaws, dependency scanning, secrets, containers, and IaC
• Native integrations across the four major source control platforms
• Customer case studies describe fast (under one week) rollout via native GitLab integration
• Small, focused team suggests an actively developed, fast-moving product

Cons

• Small company size (roughly six employees) may raise questions about long-term support scale for large enterprises
• Growth and Scale plans require a minimum developer count (5 and 20 respectively), which can push smaller paid teams into higher total cost
• Enterprise pricing is not published and requires a custom sales quote
• As a newer entrant founded in 2023, it has a shorter track record than legacy AppSec vendors
• AI-generated fixes still require developer review before merging to confirm correctness in context
• Auto-fix quotas (50 or 200 per plan) may be limiting for organizations with very large vulnerability backlogs

ColorTokens

• Ransomware containment — A security team deploys Xshield to stop a compromised endpoint from becoming a network-wide ransomware incident.
• Securing legacy and OT devices — A manufacturer or healthcare provider protects older equipment that cannot run traditional security agents using agentless segmentation.
• Meeting a Zero Trust mandate — An organization pursuing a compliance or regulatory Zero Trust requirement implements microsegmentation as a core control.

CookieYes

• WordPress site cookie compliance — WordPress site owners use CookieYes, building on its origins as the Cookie Law Info plugin, to add a compliant consent banner quickly.
• Shopify and e-commerce consent management — Online stores use CookieYes to block tracking cookies until consent and maintain compliance logs for regulatory audits.
• Agency management of multiple client domains — Digital agencies deploy CookieYes across many client websites, managing per-domain plans and geo-targeted consent flows.

Corgea

• Reducing vulnerability remediation time — Pair automated vulnerability detection with AI-drafted fixes to cut the manual research and patching time engineers spend on security findings.
• Shifting security left into pull requests — Scan pull requests automatically and optionally block risky merges, catching vulnerabilities before code reaches production.
• Consolidating multiple security tools — Replace separate SAST, SCA, secrets detection, container, and IaC scanning tools with a single integrated platform.
• Meeting compliance and audit requirements — Use Enterprise-tier SSO, audit logs, and reporting to satisfy internal governance or regulatory application security requirements.