ColorTokens vs Hyperproof

Compare ColorTokens and Hyperproof on pricing, features, platforms, and ratings — both Security tools, Custom, quote-based enterprise pricing, generally…

At a Glance

 ColorTokensHyperproof
Primary categorySecuritySecurity
RatingNot documentedNot documented
Pricing modelCustom, quote-based enterprise pricing, generally licensed by protected workload, endpoint or environment; there is no published self-serve price listEnterprise / Custom quote
Starting priceNot publicly disclosed - contact sales for a quoteCustom pricing
Free planNot documentedNot documented
Free trialNot documentedNot documented
PlatformsNot documentedWeb
Team collaborationNot documentedNot documented
AI featuresNot documentedYes
Public APINot documentedYes

Pricing Compared

Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.

ColorTokens

No individual plan breakdown documented yet.

Hyperproof

Professional — Custom (est. from ~$12,000/year) Annual
Business — Custom pricing Annual
Enterprise — Custom pricing Annual

Pros & Cons

ColorTokens

Pros

  • Agent and agentless deployment options support legacy and OT systems that cannot run traditional security agents
  • Managed service option (Xassure) lowers the barrier for teams without dedicated segmentation staff
  • Purpose-built for ransomware lateral-movement containment, a specific and well-understood attack pattern
  • Works across hybrid and multi-cloud environments without requiring network hardware changes
  • AI-assisted policy recommendations reduce manual effort in writing segmentation rules
  • Positioned as a focused specialist vendor rather than segmentation being a minor feature of a broader platform

Cons

  • Pricing is not public, making it harder to budget or compare against competitors upfront
  • Smaller company size than larger network security vendors may mean a narrower partner and integration ecosystem
  • Initial policy discovery and tuning for complex environments can take significant time
  • Primarily an enterprise-focused tool, less accessible for very small businesses
  • Requires ongoing policy maintenance as applications and infrastructure change over time
  • Limited independent, recent third-party benchmark data is publicly available

Hyperproof

Pros

  • Strong cross-framework control mapping reduces duplicate evidence-gathering work for organizations managing multiple certifications.
  • Combines compliance management and risk and vendor management in a single platform rather than requiring separate tools.
  • Deep integrations with major cloud and identity providers automate much of the manual evidence-chasing.
  • Well capitalized with over $77 million raised, suggesting continued product investment.
  • Strong reported customer satisfaction around automation and customer support in third-party reviews.

Cons

  • Pricing is not published and requires a sales conversation, making it harder to budget upfront.
  • No free trial and a mandatory implementation fee add to the upfront cost.
  • Some users report the interface feels overwhelming, particularly when drilling into control mappings or risk modules.
  • Median contract value, reported around $40,000 per year, puts it out of reach for very small startups.
  • Newer modules like UAR and AI features are still maturing relative to core compliance workflows.

Use Cases

ColorTokens

  • Ransomware containment — A security team deploys Xshield to stop a compromised endpoint from becoming a network-wide ransomware incident.
  • Securing legacy and OT devices — A manufacturer or healthcare provider protects older equipment that cannot run traditional security agents using agentless segmentation.
  • Meeting a Zero Trust mandate — An organization pursuing a compliance or regulatory Zero Trust requirement implements microsegmentation as a core control.

Hyperproof

  • Multi-framework compliance management — Security and compliance teams managing SOC 2, ISO 27001 and other certifications simultaneously use Hyperproof to map shared controls and avoid duplicate evidence collection.
  • Vendor and third-party risk assessment — Procurement and security teams assess and continuously monitor the risk posture of vendors and suppliers through Hyperproof's Mitigate module.
  • Continuous audit readiness — Organizations preparing for recurring external audits use Hyperproof to keep evidence current year-round instead of scrambling before each audit cycle.

Read the full ColorTokens review · Read the full Hyperproof review