DAViCal vs Baïkal

Compare DAViCal and Baïkal on pricing, features, platforms, and ratings — both Calendar tools, Free / Open Source vs Free (open source) pricing to decide…

At a Glance

 DAViCalBaïkal
Primary categoryCalendarCalendar
RatingNot documentedNot documented
Pricing modelFree / Open SourceFree (open source)
Starting priceFreeFree
Free planYesNot documented
Free trialNot documentedNot documented
PlatformsNot documentedWeb
Team collaborationNot documentedNot documented
AI featuresNot documentedNot documented
Public APIYesYes

Pricing Compared

Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.

DAViCal

Open Source — Free N/A

Baïkal

No individual plan breakdown documented yet.

Pros & Cons

DAViCal

Pros

  • Completely free and open source under the GPLv2 license
  • Full control and ownership over calendar and contact data via self-hosting
  • Implements open CalDAV/CardDAV standards, ensuring broad client compatibility
  • Mature, long-standing project with a stable feature set for group calendaring

Cons

  • Requires manual setup and maintenance of a PHP and PostgreSQL server stack
  • Administrative interface is functional but visually dated compared to newer alternatives
  • No official commercial support channel; relies on community and third-party providers
  • Less actively developed than some newer self-hosted alternatives like Baikal or Nextcloud

Baïkal

Pros

  • Free and open source under the GPL v3 license
  • Lightweight with minimal server requirements
  • Broad compatibility with major calendar and contacts clients
  • Simple installation via web installer or Docker

Cons

  • Minimal feature set compared to full groupware suites
  • Development pace has slowed with less frequent releases
  • Requires self-hosting and manual server maintenance

Use Cases

DAViCal

  • Self-Hosted Organizational Calendaring — Running a private, self-hosted shared calendar and scheduling server for a small business or non-profit.
  • Privacy-Focused Calendar Hosting — Keeping calendar and contact data fully in-house to meet data-residency or privacy requirements.
  • Group Meeting Scheduling — Using free/busy lookups and shared calendar delegation to coordinate meetings across a team.

Baïkal

  • Privacy-focused calendar sync — Individuals who want to self-host calendar and contact sync instead of using a third-party cloud provider.
  • Homelab self-hosting — Self-hosting enthusiasts running personal infrastructure who want a lightweight CalDAV/CardDAV server.
  • Small team calendar sharing — Small teams or families wanting shared calendars and contacts without a commercial service.

Read the full DAViCal review · Read the full Baïkal review