Compare Filevine and ContractWorks on pricing, features, platforms, and ratings — both Legal tools, Custom / Quote-based vs Subscription (flat-rate, unlimited…
At a Glance
Filevine
ContractWorks
Primary category
Legal
Legal
Rating
Not documented
Not documented
Pricing model
Custom / Quote-based
Subscription (flat-rate, unlimited users)
Starting price
Custom pricing, contact sales
$600/month
Free plan
Not documented
Not documented
Free trial
Yes
Yes
Platforms
Web, iOS, Android
Web
Team collaboration
Not documented
Not documented
AI features
Yes
Yes
Public API
Yes
Yes
Pricing Compared
Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.
Filevine
Custom — Custom pricing Contact sales
ContractWorks
Standard — $600/month Monthly/Annual
Enterprise — Custom Annual
Pros & Cons
Filevine
Pros
AI (LOIS) is deeply embedded across the entire platform rather than offered as a separate bolt-on chat tool.
Strong reputation among reviewers, with roughly a 4.8/5 rating on G2 and 4.6/5 on Capterra.
Broad module coverage (intake through depositions to signatures) reduces the need for separate point solutions.
Backed by substantial, well-known venture investors (Insight Partners, Accel), suggesting long-term platform investment and stability.
Cons
No public pricing; firms must go through a sales process to get a quote, which can slow down evaluation.
Custom, quote-based pricing makes it harder to comparison-shop against flat-rate competitors like Clio or MyCase.
Deep, module-based platform can carry a steeper learning curve for very small or solo practices with simple needs.
Some customer feedback across review sources flags inconsistent support experiences.
ContractWorks
Pros
Flat-rate pricing removes per-seat cost scaling for large teams
AI auto-tagging speeds up organizing an existing contract backlog
Built-in e-signatures avoid needing a separate tool
No extra fees for implementation, training, or migration
Cons
Entry price of around $600/month is a meaningful commitment for very small teams
Detailed pricing above the entry tier is not fully public
Less configurable than dedicated enterprise CLM platforms for complex workflows
No dedicated native mobile apps; access is web-only
Use Cases
Filevine
High-volume personal injury and mass tort practices — Firms managing large caseloads of similar matter types use Filevine's Matters and Intake modules alongside LOIS to standardize workflows and speed up case evaluation and document drafting.
Government legal offices — Prosecutors, public defenders, and state or local agencies use Filevine to manage case files, deadlines, and evidence collaboration across large teams of attorneys.
Corporate and Big Law legal departments — Larger legal teams use Filevine's document assembly, contract management, and API integrations to connect case data with existing accounting and business systems.
ContractWorks
Contract Backlog Organization — Legal teams use AI extraction to quickly organize and tag an existing library of contracts.
Company-wide Contract Visibility — Organizations give many employees access to contract data under flat-rate, unlimited-user pricing.