ghost vs dotclear

Compare ghost and dotclear on pricing, features, platforms, and ratings — both Content Marketing tools, Freemium (open-source self-hosted plus paid managed…

At a Glance

 ghostdotclear
Primary categoryContent MarketingContent Marketing
RatingNot documentedNot documented
Pricing modelFreemium (open-source self-hosted plus paid managed hosting)Free / Open Source
Starting priceFree (self-hosted); Ghost(Pro) from $18/monthFree
Free planYesNot documented
Free trialYesNot documented
PlatformsNot documentedWeb
Team collaborationNot documentedNot documented
AI featuresNot documentedNot documented
Public APIYesNot documented

Pricing Compared

Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.

ghost

Self-hosted (open source) — Free N/A
Starter (Ghost(Pro)) — $18/month Billed yearly
Publisher (Ghost(Pro)) — $29/month Billed yearly
Business (Ghost(Pro)) — $199/month Billed yearly
Custom (Ghost(Pro)) — Contact for pricing Custom

dotclear

Open Source (Self-Hosted) — Free N/A

Pros & Cons

ghost

Pros

  • Fully open source (MIT license) with a free self-hosting option and no vendor lock-in
  • Native paid membership and newsletter monetization without needing extra plugins
  • Nonprofit governance structure makes the platform structurally resistant to acquisition or shutdown
  • Lean, fast, publishing-focused architecture compared to general-purpose CMS platforms
  • Headless API supports fully custom frontends for developer teams

Cons

  • Less flexible than WordPress for building non-publishing websites (e-commerce stores, complex layouts)
  • Self-hosting requires technical setup and ongoing maintenance (Node.js, database, email deliverability)
  • Ghost(Pro) Business and Enterprise tiers are considerably pricier than many newsletter-only competitors
  • Smaller plugin/theme ecosystem than WordPress
  • Member limits on lower Ghost(Pro) tiers can require upgrading as an audience grows

dotclear

Pros

  • Completely free and open source with no paid tiers or licensing fees.
  • Lightweight and focused specifically on blogging rather than general-purpose site building.
  • Long-running, continuously maintained project with over two decades of development history.
  • Strong, active community and plugin ecosystem, especially in French-speaking regions.

Cons

  • Much smaller plugin, theme, and community ecosystem than WordPress.
  • Adoption and available support resources are heavily concentrated in French-speaking countries.
  • Requires self-hosting and basic server administration knowledge, unlike hosted blogging services.
  • Smaller global market share means fewer third-party tutorials and integrations in English.

Use Cases

ghost

  • Independent newsletter publishing — Writing and monetizing a paid email newsletter with native subscription billing.
  • Membership media sites — Running a publication with multiple paid membership tiers and gated content.
  • Developer-built headless blogs — Using Ghost as an API-driven content backend behind a custom-built frontend.

dotclear

  • Personal and independent blogging — Running a self-hosted personal blog with full control over data and hosting, without relying on a proprietary platform.
  • Multi-blog publishing networks — Managing several distinct blogs from a single Dotclear installation and admin login.
  • Podcast publishing — Distributing audio content and episode feeds natively alongside written blog posts.

Read the full ghost review · Read the full dotclear review