Grafana vs Cube

Compare Grafana and Cube on pricing, features, platforms, and ratings — both Business Intelligence tools, Freemium (Open Source plus Usage-based Cloud) vs…

At a Glance

 GrafanaCube
Primary categoryBusiness IntelligenceBusiness Intelligence
RatingNot documentedNot documented
Pricing modelFreemium (Open Source plus Usage-based Cloud)Freemium
Starting priceFree (self-hosted OSS or Grafana Cloud free tier)Free
Free planYesYes
Free trialNot documentedNot documented
PlatformsWebNot documented
Team collaborationNot documentedNot documented
AI featuresYesYes
Public APIYesYes

Pricing Compared

Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.

Grafana

Open Source (Self-Hosted) — Free N/A
Cloud Free — Free Monthly
Cloud Pro — From $19/month plus usage Monthly
Cloud Advanced — From $55/month Monthly
Enterprise — Custom (from around $25,000/year) Annual

Cube

Free — Free forever
Starter — $40/developer/month + ~$0.10/CCU ($99/month minimum) monthly
Premium — $80/developer/month + ~$0.25/CCU ($10K/year commit) annual commit
Enterprise — Custom annual

Pros & Cons

Grafana

Pros

  • Free and open source core with no vendor lock-in to a single data store
  • Connects to virtually any metrics, logs or trace data source in one interface
  • Highly customizable dashboards backed by a large community plugin ecosystem
  • Usage-based Cloud pricing can be more cost-effective at scale than closed observability suites

Cons

  • Usage-based Cloud pricing can become unpredictable for high-cardinality metrics
  • Self-hosting the full LGTM stack requires meaningful operational expertise
  • Some advanced features like SSO and premium connectors require Enterprise licensing
  • PromQL, LogQL and TraceQL have a learning curve for newcomers

Cube

Pros

  • Open-source core with a large, active GitHub community
  • Headless architecture avoids vendor lock-in to a single BI front end
  • Single governed metric definitions reduce inconsistent numbers across tools
  • Increasingly positioned for AI/agentic use cases, not just traditional dashboards

Cons

  • Usage-based Cube Compute Unit billing can make costs less predictable than flat per-seat pricing
  • Requires engineering effort to define and maintain the semantic data model
  • Premium tier requires a $10,000 annual consumption commitment
  • Enterprise features like BYOC and custom LLM support require a custom quote

Use Cases

Grafana

  • Infrastructure and Kubernetes Monitoring — Visualize cluster health, resource usage and application metrics collected by Prometheus and other exporters.
  • Business and Executive Reporting Dashboards — Combine data from SQL databases, APIs and cloud services into shareable business dashboards.
  • IoT and Sensor Data Visualization — Monitor time-series data streaming from industrial sensors, devices and edge deployments.

Cube

  • Embedded analytics in SaaS products — Software companies use Cube to power in-app dashboards and reporting for their own customers without duplicating metric logic.
  • Consistent enterprise metrics — Data platform teams centralize metric definitions in Cube so Tableau, Power BI, and internal tools all report the same numbers.
  • AI agent data access — Organizations connect AI copilots and chat assistants to Cube's semantic layer so they answer questions using governed, trustworthy metrics.

Read the full Grafana review · Read the full Cube review