Compare Hyperproof and Akeyless on pricing, features, platforms, and ratings — both Security tools, Enterprise / Custom quote vs Freemium pricing to decide…
At a Glance
Hyperproof
Akeyless
Primary category
Security
Security
Rating
Not documented
Not documented
Pricing model
Enterprise / Custom quote
Freemium
Starting price
Custom pricing
Free
Free plan
Not documented
Yes
Free trial
Not documented
Not documented
Platforms
Web
Web
Team collaboration
Not documented
Not documented
AI features
Yes
Yes
Public API
Yes
Yes
Pricing Compared
Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.
Hyperproof
Professional — Custom (est. from ~$12,000/year) Annual
Business — Custom pricing Annual
Enterprise — Custom pricing Annual
Akeyless
Free — $0 N/A
Enterprise — Custom (contact sales) custom
Pros & Cons
Hyperproof
Pros
Strong cross-framework control mapping reduces duplicate evidence-gathering work for organizations managing multiple certifications.
Combines compliance management and risk and vendor management in a single platform rather than requiring separate tools.
Deep integrations with major cloud and identity providers automate much of the manual evidence-chasing.
Well capitalized with over $77 million raised, suggesting continued product investment.
Strong reported customer satisfaction around automation and customer support in third-party reviews.
Cons
Pricing is not published and requires a sales conversation, making it harder to budget upfront.
No free trial and a mandatory implementation fee add to the upfront cost.
Some users report the interface feels overwhelming, particularly when drilling into control mappings or risk modules.
Median contract value, reported around $40,000 per year, puts it out of reach for very small startups.
Newer modules like UAR and AI features are still maturing relative to core compliance workflows.
Akeyless
Pros
SaaS delivery removes the operational burden of running vault infrastructure
Free tier available for evaluation and small-scale use
Broad compliance certification coverage (ISO 27001, SOC 2, FIPS 140-3)
Covers secrets, certificates, encryption, and AI agent identity in one platform
Cons
Enterprise pricing isn't published and requires a sales conversation
Hybrid deployment with on-prem gateways adds setup complexity compared with pure SaaS
Use Cases
Hyperproof
Multi-framework compliance management — Security and compliance teams managing SOC 2, ISO 27001 and other certifications simultaneously use Hyperproof to map shared controls and avoid duplicate evidence collection.
Vendor and third-party risk assessment — Procurement and security teams assess and continuously monitor the risk posture of vendors and suppliers through Hyperproof's Mitigate module.
Continuous audit readiness — Organizations preparing for recurring external audits use Hyperproof to keep evidence current year-round instead of scrambling before each audit cycle.
Akeyless
Centralized Secrets Management — Replacing scattered API keys and credentials across environments with dynamic, centrally managed secrets.