Openmeetings vs Microsoft Teams

Compare Openmeetings and Microsoft Teams on pricing, features, platforms, and ratings — both Collaboration tools, Open Source vs Freemium pricing to decide…

At a Glance

 OpenmeetingsMicrosoft Teams
Primary categoryCollaborationCollaboration
RatingNot documentedNot documented
Pricing modelOpen SourceFreemium
Starting priceFreeFree (paid plans from $4/user/month for Teams Essentials)
Free planNot documentedYes
Free trialNot documentedNot documented
PlatformsWebWeb, Mac, Windows
Team collaborationNot documentedNot documented
AI featuresNot documentedNot documented
Public APINot documentedNot documented

Pricing Compared

Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.

Openmeetings

Open Source (Self-Hosted) — Free N/A

Microsoft Teams

Free — Free N/A
Teams Essentials — $4/user/month Monthly or annual
Microsoft 365 Business Basic — From $6/user/month Monthly or annual
Microsoft 365 E3/E5 — Roughly $39-$60/user/month Annual

Pros & Cons

Openmeetings

Pros

  • Completely free and open source under the Apache License
  • Self-hostable for full control over meeting data and privacy
  • No per-user licensing fees regardless of meeting size
  • HTML5-based with no plugin requirements
  • Integrates with enterprise identity systems via LDAP and OAuth2

Cons

  • User interface is dated compared to modern tools like Zoom or Google Meet
  • Self-hosting requires server and media infrastructure expertise (Kurento setup)
  • Smaller community and slower release cadence than commercial competitors
  • Mobile experience is more limited than native mobile conferencing apps
  • Documentation can be sparse for advanced configuration scenarios

Microsoft Teams

Pros

  • Free tier is generous for small teams
  • Tight integration with Office apps and SharePoint
  • Handles both chat and enterprise-grade video meetings in one app
  • Strong compliance and security features for regulated industries at higher tiers
  • Scales from free personal use to large enterprise deployments

Cons

  • Interface can feel cluttered compared to Slack
  • Full functionality requires a Microsoft 365 subscription
  • Free version limits meetings to 60 minutes
  • Can be resource-heavy on lower-end devices
  • Admin and tenant configuration can be complex for IT teams

Use Cases

Openmeetings

  • Online education and training — Educational institutions host online classes and training sessions using Openmeetings' whiteboard and recording features.
  • Self-hosted enterprise conferencing — Enterprises that require full data control deploy Openmeetings on their own infrastructure instead of using SaaS conferencing tools.
  • Embedded white-label conferencing — Developers use Openmeetings' REST and SOAP APIs to embed video conferencing into their own websites or products.

Microsoft Teams

  • Company-wide team communication — Centralize chat, files, and meetings for an entire organization.
  • Hybrid meetings and webinars — Host internal meetings and larger external webinars with screen sharing and recording.
  • Frontline worker shift coordination — Coordinate shifts, tasks, and announcements for distributed frontline staff.

Read the full Openmeetings review · Read the full Microsoft Teams review