rallly vs seatsurfing

Compare rallly and seatsurfing on pricing, features, platforms, and ratings — both Scheduling tools, Freemium (free hobby tier plus paid Pro subscription) vs…

At a Glance

 ralllyseatsurfing
Primary categorySchedulingScheduling
RatingNot documentedNot documented
Pricing modelFreemium (free hobby tier plus paid Pro subscription)Open source (free self-hosted) with a freemium hosted SaaS offering paid per-user tiers
Starting priceFree (Pro plan at $56 per year)Free (self-hosted, or hosted SaaS for up to 10 users); Professional from 0.90 euros per user per month
Free planNot documentedNot documented
Free trialNot documentedNot documented
PlatformsNot documentedNot documented
Team collaborationNot documentedNot documented
AI featuresNot documentedNot documented
Public APINot documentedNot documented

Pricing Compared

Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.

rallly

Hobby — Free Free forever
Pro — $56 per year
Self-Hosted (Single-User) — Free N/A

seatsurfing

Self-Hosted — 0 euros N/A
Hosted Free — 0 euros N/A
Hosted Professional — 0.90 euros per user per month Monthly (billed upfront per cycle)
Hosted Enterprise — Custom quote Contact sales

Pros & Cons

rallly

Pros

  • Free Hobby tier covers core scheduling needs with no account required for voters
  • Affordable Pro tier at $56 per year with locked-in pricing for early subscribers
  • Open source and self-hostable for full control over data
  • Large, active user base with over 188,000 registered users
  • Multi-language support broadens accessibility for global teams
  • Simple, focused interface without unnecessary complexity

Cons

  • Free tier automatically deletes inactive polls after 30 days
  • Multi-user self-hosting requires a paid license rather than being fully free
  • Smaller feature set than full-scale scheduling platforms like Calendly
  • Maintained by a small, independent team rather than a larger company
  • No native mobile app; relies on the responsive web interface
  • Advanced integrations (e.g., deep calendar sync) are more limited than larger competitors

seatsurfing

Pros

  • Free, unlimited-user self-hosted deployment option under an open-source license
  • Hosted SaaS Free tier available for small teams up to 10 users with no credit card required
  • Low per-user cost on the Professional plan at 0.90 euros per user per month
  • Integrates with common workplace tools including Microsoft Teams, Exchange, and Confluence
  • Managed hosting located in Germany, appealing to organizations with EU data residency needs

Cons

  • Precise company founding year and team size are not consistently published, making vendor maturity harder to verify
  • Enterprise plan requires a minimum of 500 users, out of reach for smaller organizations wanting dedicated infrastructure
  • Advanced features like booking approvals, recurring bookings, and kiosk mode require the paid Professional tier
  • Self-hosting requires in-house technical setup and maintenance despite being free
  • Smaller brand recognition compared to larger commercial workplace management platforms

Use Cases

rallly

  • Group meeting scheduling — Coordinate meeting times across a team or group without lengthy email chains.
  • Event and gathering planning — Find the best date and time for social events, gatherings, or recurring group activities.
  • Privacy-conscious self-hosted scheduling — Run scheduling polls entirely on private infrastructure instead of a third-party service.

seatsurfing

  • Hybrid office desk sharing — Organizations with flexible or hot-desking policies use Seatsurfing to let employees reserve desks in advance through a web interface or Microsoft Teams.
  • Meeting room reservation management — Teams use Seatsurfing to coordinate meeting room bookings alongside desk reservations, reducing scheduling conflicts.
  • Self-hosted workplace booking for data-sensitive organizations — Organizations with strict data control requirements self-host Seatsurfing on their own infrastructure for free rather than using a third-party SaaS.

Read the full rallly review · Read the full seatsurfing review