Compare rediker and Open eClass on pricing, features, platforms, and ratings — both Online Learning tools, quote_based vs Open Source pricing to decide which…
At a Glance
rediker
Open eClass
Primary category
Online Learning
Online Learning
Rating
Not documented
Not documented
Pricing model
quote_based
Open Source
Starting price
Not documented
Free
Free plan
Not documented
Not documented
Free trial
Not documented
Not documented
Platforms
Web, Mobile App
Web
Team collaboration
Yes
Not documented
AI features
Not documented
Not documented
Public API
Not documented
Not documented
Pricing Compared
Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.
rediker
No individual plan breakdown documented yet.
Open eClass
Self-Hosted (Open Source) — Free N/A
GUnet Free Hosted Service (free.openeclass.org) — Free N/A
Pros & Cons
rediker
Pros
Long-established vendor (founded 1980) with 45+ years serving K-12 schools
Broad, integrated product suite covering admissions, gradebook, scheduling, billing, and parent/student portals rather than a single point tool
Large existing install base: 100,000+ educators on TeacherPlus and 2M+ parents/students on PlusPortals
Purpose-built for K-12 with support for public, private, Catholic, charter, and international schools
Integrates with common education tools such as Clever, Google Classroom, Frontline Education, and Microsoft OneNote
Cons
No published pricing — schools must contact sales for a quote, making cost comparison harder
Focused solely on PK-12; not a fit for higher education institutions
Modular product suite (AdminPlus, AdmissionsPlus, TeacherPlus, PlusPortals, FINACS, RediSite) may require piecing together multiple modules for full functionality
Open eClass
Pros
Completely free and open source with no per-seat licensing costs
Over two decades of continuous development and production use across Greek higher education
Backed by a stable, mission-driven academic consortium (GUnet) rather than a for-profit vendor
Offers both self-hosted and free managed hosting options
Mature core LMS feature set covering content, assessment, and communication needs
Cons
Documentation and community support skew heavily toward Greek-language users and institutions
Smaller global mindshare and plugin ecosystem compared to Moodle or Canvas
Self-hosting requires in-house IT capacity to install, secure, and maintain the platform
User interface and design language feel dated next to modern commercial LMS products
Adoption outside Greece and Greek-affiliated institutions remains limited
Use Cases
rediker
Open eClass
Public university course delivery — Universities use Open eClass as their primary LMS to publish materials, manage enrollment, and run assessments for large numbers of students without licensing costs.
K-12 and vocational e-learning — Schools and training centers with limited technology budgets deploy Open eClass to support asynchronous learning and homework distribution.
Low-resource institutional hosting — Smaller institutions without dedicated IT teams use GUnet's free hosted service to get LMS functionality without managing their own servers.