Salut à Toi vs Jami

Compare Salut à Toi and Jami on pricing, features, platforms, and ratings — both Team Chat tools, Free and open source, no cost vs Free pricing to decide…

At a Glance

 Salut à ToiJami
Primary categoryTeam ChatTeam Chat
RatingNot documentedNot documented
Pricing modelFree and open source, no costFree
Starting priceFreeFree
Free planNot documentedNot documented
Free trialNot documentedNot documented
PlatformsWeb, AndroidiOS, Android, Mac, Windows
Team collaborationNot documentedNot documented
AI featuresNot documentedNot documented
Public APINot documentedYes

Pricing Compared

Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.

Salut à Toi

Open Source — Free N/A

Jami

Free — Free N/A

Pros & Cons

Salut à Toi

Pros

  • Fully free, open-source, and federated, with no vendor lock-in or subscription cost
  • Unusually broad feature set for an XMPP client, spanning messaging, blogging, calls, and file sharing in one platform
  • Multi-frontend design lets the same account be used from desktop, web, command-line, or mobile-style interfaces
  • Backed by NLnet and NGI funding, supporting continued development of privacy features

Cons

  • Long, largely solo-led development history means a smaller contributor base than major messaging platforms
  • Smaller user base than mainstream chat apps, so network effects and contact discovery are limited
  • Documentation and interface are primarily oriented toward technically comfortable users
  • Now branded as Libervia, which can cause confusion for people searching under the older Salut à Toi name

Jami

Pros

  • Completely free with no ads, limits, or paid tiers
  • True peer-to-peer design means no company holds message content
  • Backed by the Free Software Foundation as an official GNU package
  • Works across all major desktop and mobile platforms
  • Can operate entirely offline over a local network

Cons

  • Smaller user base than mainstream messengers like Signal or WhatsApp makes adoption harder
  • Peer-to-peer calls can be less reliable than server-relayed calls behind restrictive NATs or firewalls
  • Interface and onboarding are less polished than commercial competitors
  • Group features and conferencing are less battle-tested at large scale
  • No official enterprise support contracts beyond community and Savoir-faire Linux consulting

Use Cases

Salut à Toi

  • Federated Personal Messaging — Privacy-conscious individuals use Salut à Toi/Libervia as their primary XMPP client for encrypted one-to-one and group messaging without depending on a centralized provider.
  • Combined Blogging and Chat — Users who want to publish blog or microblog posts and chat from the same federated identity use its integrated PubSub-based blogging features.
  • Cross-Network Bridging — Technical users bridge XMPP conversations to IRC, email, or ActivityPub-based networks to consolidate communication in one client.

Jami

  • Private peer-to-peer team communication — Privacy-conscious organizations use Jami for internal messaging and calls that never transit a third-party server.
  • SIP-compatible calling — Users connect Jami to existing SIP telephony infrastructure for interoperable voice calling alongside peer-to-peer contacts.
  • Offline local-network messaging — Teams or households on the same local network use Jami to message and call without needing internet access.

Read the full Salut à Toi review · Read the full Jami review