shoutem vs Stacker

Compare shoutem and Stacker on pricing, features, platforms, and ratings — both No-Code tools, Paid (free trial available) vs subscription pricing to decide…

At a Glance

 shoutemStacker
Primary categoryNo-CodeNo-Code
RatingNot documentedNot documented
Pricing modelPaid (free trial available)subscription
Starting price$49$50/month (Standard plan, 250 credits)
Free planNot documentedNot documented
Free trialYesYes
PlatformsiOS, Android, Mobile AppNot documented
Team collaborationNot documentedNot documented
AI featuresNot documentedYes
Public APINot documentedNot documented

Pricing Compared

Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.

shoutem

No individual plan breakdown documented yet.

Stacker

Standard (250 credits) — $50/month monthly
Standard (500 credits) — $100/month monthly
Standard (1,000 credits) — $200/month monthly
Standard (2,500 credits) — $500/month monthly
Standard (5,000 credits) — $1,000/month monthly
Standard (10,000 credits) — $2,000/month monthly
Enterprise — Custom pricing contact sales

Pros & Cons

shoutem

Pros

  • No coding required to design and publish a fully native iOS and Android app
  • Industry-specific templates (church, radio, podcast, events, travel) speed up setup
  • Built-in CMS lets non-technical users update app content after launch
  • Free trial lets prospects build and preview an app before paying
  • Extension marketplace adds functionality like push notifications and commerce without custom development

Cons

  • Entry-level plan only covers Android publishing; iOS requires a higher-priced tier
  • Pricing is billed quarterly rather than month-to-month, raising the effective commitment
  • Public site does not clearly document deeper third-party integrations (CRM, payments, marketing tools)
  • As with most app-builder platforms, apps depend on Shoutem's infrastructure and extension marketplace rather than fully custom code
  • Enterprise/custom pricing isn't publicly disclosed, so larger teams must contact sales to scope cost

Stacker

Pros

  • No-code approach lets non-developers build functional internal tools and client portals quickly
  • Credit-based pricing avoids per-seat costs, which suits apps with many external client users
  • Strong fit for teams already using Airtable or Google Sheets as their data layer
  • AI prompt-to-app builder speeds up initial app creation
  • Backed by significant venture funding, including a $20 million Series A from Andreessen Horowitz

Cons

  • Credit-based pricing can become expensive as usage scales beyond the base tiers
  • Dependent on underlying data sources like Airtable, which have their own cost and scaling limits
  • Less suited to highly custom or complex application logic than full-code development
  • Enterprise pricing is not publicly disclosed and requires contacting sales
  • Recent rebrand from stackerhq.com to stacker.ai may cause some confusion for existing users

Use Cases

shoutem

Stacker

  • Internal Operations Tools — Operations teams replace manual spreadsheet workflows with structured internal apps for tracking projects, inventory, or customer records.
  • Client and Partner Portals — Businesses build secure, branded portals that give external clients or partners controlled access to relevant data.
  • Custom CRM Replacement — Small businesses use Stacker to build a lightweight custom CRM on top of existing Airtable or Google Sheets data rather than adopting a heavier, generic CRM platform.

Read the full shoutem review · Read the full Stacker review