Compare SingleStore and filess.io on pricing, features, platforms, and ratings — both Databases tools, Usage-based (free tier available) vs Freemium pricing…
At a Glance
SingleStore
filess.io
Primary category
Databases
Databases
Rating
Not documented
Not documented
Pricing model
Usage-based (free tier available)
Freemium
Starting price
Free (Shared tier); Standard plans from $0.99 per hour
Free
Free plan
Yes
Yes
Free trial
Not documented
Not documented
Platforms
Not documented
Web
Team collaboration
Not documented
Not documented
AI features
Yes
Not documented
Public API
Yes
Yes
Pricing Compared
Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.
SingleStore
Shared — Free Monthly
Standard — From $0.99/hour Usage-based (hourly)
Enterprise — From $1.49/hour Usage-based (hourly)
BYOC (Bring Your Own Cloud) — Custom pricing Custom
filess.io
Free (Hobby) — Free free
Basic — €3.99/month monthly
Pro — €6.99/month monthly
Advanced — €17.99/month monthly
Business — €29.99/month monthly
Dedicated Resources — From about €0.80 per 0.25 vCPU, pay-as-you-go monthly
Pros & Cons
SingleStore
Pros
Unifies transactional and analytical workloads in a single database
Free Shared tier lowers the barrier to evaluation
Full ANSI SQL compatibility eases migration from existing systems
Native vector search suits modern AI and RAG use cases
Usage-based pricing scales cost with actual workload size
Cons
Usage-based hourly pricing can become expensive at large scale
Enterprise features (audit logging, PITR) require the higher-priced tier
Recent private equity acquisition (2025) introduces some roadmap uncertainty
Smaller ecosystem and community than long-established databases like PostgreSQL
BYOC and custom enterprise pricing require a sales conversation rather than transparent self-serve pricing
filess.io
Pros
Genuinely free tier with no credit card required
Very fast database provisioning
Supports five major database engines from one account
Pay-as-you-go dedicated resources for production workloads
Includes web hosting and tunneling alongside databases
Cons
Free tier storage (10MB) is only suitable for small tests, not real apps
Company background such as founding year and headquarters is not publicly disclosed
Itemized dedicated pricing can be harder to estimate than flat-rate plans
Less brand recognition than established DBaaS providers
Use Cases
SingleStore
Real-time operational dashboards — Teams use SingleStore to power customer-facing and internal dashboards that need fresh data queried with low latency, without a separate ETL step into a warehouse.
AI and retrieval-augmented generation applications — Developers use SingleStore's native vector search alongside relational data to build RAG pipelines and AI-powered search features.
High-throughput transactional workloads — Companies with demanding OLTP requirements use SingleStore to combine transaction processing and analytics in one distributed system.
filess.io
Prototyping a new app — Spin up a free database in seconds to test an idea before committing to paid infrastructure.
Hosting a small production app — Use a shared paid plan or dedicated resources to run a live application's database with backups.
Exposing a local dev server — Use secure tunnels to share a locally running application with clients or teammates without deploying it.
Multi-region deployment — Deploy databases closer to users in different parts of the world to reduce latency.