Sprinto vs Thoropass

Sprinto and Thoropass both automate compliance work, but they bundle different things around it — Sprinto pairs its automation software with built-in…

Best for Sprinto: Teams that want an ease-of-use-rated compliance dashboard with built-in device management (MDM) and hands-on 1:1 guidance, while using a separate external auditor.
Best for Thoropass: Teams that want to consolidate the formal audit itself (via Thoropass's affiliated CPA firm, Laika Compliance, LLC) and penetration testing alongside compliance software, rather than coordinating a separate audit firm.

At a Glance

 SprintoThoropass
Primary categorySecuritySecurity
RatingNot documentedNot documented
Pricing modelsubscription (quote-based)custom
Starting priceNot documentedCustom pricing (platform plus audit bundles reported from roughly $8,700/year)
Free planNot documentedNot documented
Free trialNot documentedNot documented
PlatformsNot documentedNot documented
Team collaborationNot documentedNot documented
AI featuresNot documentedYes
Public APINot documentedNot documented

Key Differences

Audit delivery model

Sprinto: Software plus 1:1 expert guidance; no mention of an owned or affiliated CPA firm performing the audit.

Thoropass: Bundles a licensed CPA audit firm (Laika Compliance, LLC) directly into the platform.

Determines whether the actual attestation audit is performed in-house or must be sourced separately.

Device management

Sprinto: Includes built-in lightweight Mobile Device Management (MDM).

Thoropass: No MDM capability documented.

Reduces the need for a separate device management tool if MDM needs are basic.

Security testing services

Sprinto: Not documented.

Thoropass: Offers in-house CREST-accredited penetration testing and vulnerability scanning.

Having pentesting under the same vendor can simplify audit evidence collection.

Stated integration count

Sprinto: States 200+ integrations for continuous compliance risk visibility.

Thoropass: No specific integration count stated.

A documented integration count signals breadth of automated evidence collection sources.

Support model

Sprinto: Includes 1:1 expert guidance and 24/7 assistance as a stated feature.

Thoropass: No comparable guided-support feature documented; its differentiator is the bundled CPA firm instead.

Hands-on guided support vs. audit-firm access represent different kinds of help during certification.

Feature-by-Feature

Compliance Automation

FeatureSprintoThoropass
Continuous control/evidence monitoringAvailableAvailable
Multi-framework supportAvailableAvailable
Policy templatesAvailableNot documented

Audit & Security Testing

FeatureSprintoThoropass
In-house/affiliated CPA audit firmNot documentedAvailable
Penetration testingNot documentedAvailable
Vulnerability scanningNot documentedAvailable

Support & Extras

FeatureSprintoThoropass
Built-in device management (MDM)AvailableNot documented
1:1 / 24-7 expert guidanceAvailableNot documented
Stated integration countAvailableNot documented

Trust & Pricing

FeatureSprintoThoropass
Public pricingUnavailableUnavailable
Customer/trust signalAvailableAvailable

Pricing Compared

Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.

Sprinto

Custom (Quote-Based) — Custom pricing (third-party estimates range from approximately $6,000 to $25,000+ per year depending on frameworks and company size) Annual

Thoropass

Platform Subscription — Approximately $8,700 per year annual
SOC 2 Audit Subscription — Approximately $5,800 per year annual
Bundled SOC 2 Type II — Approximately $12,000 to $30,000 per year annual

Pros & Cons

Sprinto

Pros

  • Continuous, automated monitoring reduces manual audit-prep work
  • Broad framework coverage beyond just SOC 2 and ISO 27001
  • Large integration catalog covering common cloud and business tools
  • Real-time dashboard gives ongoing visibility into compliance status
  • Established customer base of 3,000-plus companies across 75 countries

Cons

  • No public pricing, requiring a sales conversation for an exact quote
  • Costs can scale significantly for multi-framework or enterprise plans
  • Setup requires connecting multiple internal systems via integrations
  • Best suited to companies already using cloud infrastructure Sprinto can monitor
  • Third-party pricing estimates vary, so actual cost is only confirmed via quote

Thoropass

Pros

  • Combines compliance software and an accredited audit firm in one vendor
  • Supports a wide range of frameworks including SOC 2, ISO 27001, HITRUST, PCI DSS, and HIPAA
  • AICPA peer-reviewed, PCI QSA, and HITRUST Accredited Assessor credentials
  • Bundled platform-plus-audit pricing can reduce total compliance cost
  • Well-funded company with dedicated EMEA presence for international customers

Cons

  • Pricing is not fully transparent and requires a custom quote in most cases
  • Can represent a significant cost for very early-stage startups
  • Best value depends on bundling the platform with a Thoropass-run audit
  • Implementation and evidence collection still require meaningful internal time investment

Use Cases

Choose Sprinto: Teams that want an ease-of-use-rated compliance dashboard with built-in device management (MDM) and hands-on 1:1 guidance, while using a separate external auditor.
Choose Thoropass: Teams that want to consolidate the formal audit itself (via Thoropass's affiliated CPA firm, Laika Compliance, LLC) and penetration testing alongside compliance software, rather than coordinating a separate audit firm.
Need both: Organizations juggling multiple frameworks sometimes run Sprinto for day-to-day control monitoring while engaging Thoropass specifically for the formal audit and penetration test deliverables auditors require.

Sprinto

  • First-time SOC 2 certification — Early-stage SaaS startups use Sprinto to prepare for and pass their first SOC 2 audit ahead of enterprise sales cycles.
  • Multi-framework compliance management — Scaling companies use Sprinto to manage SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, and other frameworks together from one dashboard.
  • Continuous security monitoring — Security and compliance teams use Sprinto for ongoing, automated control monitoring rather than periodic manual reviews.

Thoropass

  • First-time SOC 2 certification — Startups pursuing their first SOC 2 report can use Thoropass to prepare evidence and complete the audit through one vendor.
  • Multi-framework compliance programs — Companies that need SOC 2 plus ISO 27001, HIPAA, or PCI DSS can manage overlapping controls in a single system.
  • Continuous compliance monitoring — Organizations maintaining an existing certification can use ongoing monitoring to stay audit-ready year-round.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does each platform automate?

Sprinto automates SOC 2 and other compliance work, evaluating over 1 million compliance checks monthly; Thoropass combines a licensed CPA audit firm (Laika Compliance, LLC) with AI-assisted software covering SOC 2, ISO 27001, and 30+ other frameworks end-to-end.

Does either include device management?

Sprinto includes a built-in lightweight Mobile Device Management (MDM) capability; Thoropass's facts don't mention an MDM feature.

Does either offer penetration testing?

Thoropass offers CREST-accredited penetration testing with audit-ready reporting; Sprinto's facts don't describe a penetration testing feature.

How many integrations does Sprinto support?

Sprinto supports 200+ integrations for continuous compliance risk visibility; Thoropass's facts don't state a specific integration count.

Is pricing public for either platform?

No — neither publishes pricing. Sprinto's site doesn't list specific plans, and Thoropass pricing varies by frameworks pursued, audit scope, company size, and required services as a tailored quote.

Read the full Sprinto review · Read the full Thoropass review