Supercast vs Podlove

Compare Supercast and Podlove on pricing, features, platforms, and ratings — both Podcast Hosting tools, usage-based (flat per-subscriber fee) vs Open Source…

At a Glance

 SupercastPodlove
Primary categoryPodcast HostingPodcast Hosting
RatingNot documentedNot documented
Pricing modelusage-based (flat per-subscriber fee)Open Source
Starting price$0.59 per subscriber per monthFree
Free planNot documentedYes
Free trialNot documentedNot documented
PlatformsWebNot documented
Team collaborationNot documentedNot documented
AI featuresNot documentedNot documented
Public APIYesNot documented

Pricing Compared

Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.

Supercast

All-in Plan — $0.59 per subscriber monthly, per subscriber
Custom — Custom custom

Podlove

Open Source (Self-Hosted) — Free N/A

Pros & Cons

Supercast

Pros

  • Flat per-subscriber pricing instead of a percentage of revenue
  • No platform take-rate beyond the flat fee and standard Stripe processing
  • Purpose-built for podcast monetization rather than a generic membership tool
  • Proven results, with top podcasters earning millions in annual subscription revenue
  • Supports multiple pricing tiers, trials, and promotions out of the box

Cons

  • The per-subscriber fee can add up for shows with a large base of low-paying subscribers
  • Primarily focused on podcasting, offering less flexibility for other content formats
  • Multi-show and network pricing requires contacting sales rather than transparent published rates
  • Small company size may mean more limited support bandwidth than larger platforms
  • Stripe processing fees apply on top of the flat platform fee

Podlove

Pros

  • Completely free and open source under the MIT license
  • Full ownership and control of podcast data, feed, and media files
  • Deep WordPress integration for creators already using WordPress
  • Fine-grained feed and chapter control not available on many hosted platforms
  • Strong reputation among German-language and public-broadcast podcasts

Cons

  • Requires a self-hosted WordPress site and separate media hosting/bandwidth arrangement
  • Steeper learning curve than managed podcast hosting platforms
  • No built-in monetization tools like ads or listener subscriptions
  • Smaller, volunteer-run community means slower support response times
  • No official mobile app or centralized analytics dashboard

Use Cases

Supercast

  • Independent podcaster premium feed — Offer an ad-free or bonus-content subscription feed directly to a show's existing audience.
  • Podcast network multi-show subscriptions — Bundle subscriptions across multiple shows under one network-wide offering.
  • Creator AMAs and bonus content — Use interactive AMA tools and bonus episodes to deepen engagement with paying subscribers.

Podlove

  • Self-hosted independent podcasting — A technically comfortable podcaster uses Podlove on their own WordPress site to fully own their feed, media, and data rather than relying on a third-party host.
  • Public broadcaster and newsroom podcasting — Public broadcasters and newsrooms use Podlove to publish shows directly from their existing WordPress infrastructure with fine-grained feed control.
  • Open standards advocacy — Podcasters who prioritize open web standards and data portability choose Podlove over proprietary hosted platforms.

Read the full Supercast review · Read the full Podlove review