Compare Uptime Kuma and Forgejo on pricing, features, platforms, and ratings — both DevOps tools, open-source vs Open Source / Free pricing to decide which…
At a Glance
Uptime Kuma
Forgejo
Primary category
DevOps
DevOps
Rating
Not documented
Not documented
Pricing model
open-source
Open Source / Free
Starting price
Free
Free (self-hosted)
Free plan
Yes
Yes
Free trial
Not documented
Not documented
Platforms
Web, Windows
Web
Team collaboration
Not documented
Not documented
AI features
Not documented
Not documented
Public API
Not documented
Yes
Pricing Compared
Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.
Completely free and open source with the MIT License and no feature restrictions
Supports a very wide range of monitor types compared to many commercial competitors
Large, active GitHub community with frequent updates and over 88,000 stars
Modern, fast, reactive dashboard with light and dark mode
Extensive notification integrations covering more than 90 services
Cons
Requires self-hosting and ongoing server maintenance, unlike managed SaaS monitoring tools
No official managed cloud version from the core maintainer, so uptime of the monitor itself depends on the user's own infrastructure
Advanced enterprise features like SLA reporting and team role management are more limited than commercial alternatives
Community support model rather than dedicated paid support channels
Forgejo
Pros
Fully free and open source with no licensing cost for self-hosting
Nonprofit, community-based governance under Codeberg e.V. reduces the risk of a future for-profit takeover
Lightweight resource footprint makes self-hosting accessible on modest, inexpensive hardware
GitHub-Actions-compatible CI/CD eases migration for teams already using GitHub Actions workflows
Actively shipping federation features (ForgeFed) that no major competing forge currently matches
Cons
Federation remains an early, in-progress feature; full pull request, issue, and identity federation are not yet delivered
No official first-party commercial hosted tier, so non-technical users must rely on third-party or community hosting
Smaller ecosystem of integrations and enterprise support compared to GitHub or GitLab
Ongoing divergence from Gitea since the 2024 hard fork means the two projects may increasingly require separate evaluation over time
Use Cases
Uptime Kuma
Self-hosted website monitoring — Individuals and small teams monitor their websites and APIs for downtime without paying for a SaaS monitoring subscription.
Home lab and NAS monitoring — Home lab enthusiasts run Uptime Kuma alongside other self-hosted services to track their availability on a home server or NAS.
Public status pages for services — Teams publish a status page built on Uptime Kuma to communicate uptime and incidents to their users transparently.
Forgejo
Self-hosted GitHub alternative — Development teams and organizations self-host Forgejo to get GitHub-like repository hosting, pull requests, issues, and CI/CD while keeping full control of their infrastructure and data.
European data sovereignty and public-sector hosting — European companies and public-sector bodies choose Forgejo for its non-profit governance and self-hosting model to keep source code and CI/CD data within jurisdictions they control, avoiding dependency on US-based commercial platforms.
Open-source project hosting under community governance — Open-source projects host their code on community-run Forgejo instances like Codeberg.org to avoid dependency on a single for-profit platform vendor.