Compare weeztix and Clovo on pricing, features, platforms, and ratings — both Scheduling tools, Custom / Contact sales vs Freemium: no monthly fee and no…
At a Glance
weeztix
Clovo
Primary category
Scheduling
Scheduling
Rating
Not documented
Not documented
Pricing model
Custom / Contact sales
Freemium: no monthly fee and no credit card required to start; once a studio starts earning, Clovo adds 1% on top of Stripe processing fees, capped at $1,100 + GST per year.
Starting price
Not documented
Not documented
Free plan
Not documented
Not documented
Free trial
Not documented
Not documented
Platforms
Web, Android, Mobile App
iOS, Android, Mobile App
Team collaboration
Not documented
Not documented
AI features
Not documented
Not documented
Public API
Yes
Not documented
Pricing Compared
Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.
weeztix
No individual plan breakdown documented yet.
Clovo
No individual plan breakdown documented yet.
Pros & Cons
weeztix
Pros
Conversion-focused ticket shop that can be embedded on your own site or hosted by Weeztix
No fixed subscription cost — you pay a per-ticket booking fee that can be passed on to buyers
First 5,000 tickets for free events are free of charge
700+ integrations plus API, including Mailchimp, Slack, Zapier, Spotify and TicketSwap
Add-on ecosystem for cashless payments (WeezPay), staff accreditation (WeezCrew) and safe resale (SecureSwap)
Strong public review scores (e.g. 4.9/5 on Google, 4.5/5 on Trustpilot)
Cons
No flat public price list — paid-event pricing is quoted based on ticket volume, so you need a custom quote
Per-ticket booking fees can add up for large paid events if absorbed by the organizer
Advanced features like the 24/7 emergency hotline are limited to higher/paid tiers
Breadth of add-ons and integrations can be more than smaller, one-off events need
Clovo
Pros
No monthly software fee — Clovo only charges 1% on top of standard Stripe processing, capped at $1,100 + GST per year, so cost scales with studio revenue rather than a flat seat price.
Studios get fully branded native iOS and Android apps for their own clients, rather than being listed inside a shared marketplace app.
Purpose-built for the Australian market, with AWS Sydney hosting, direct local bank payouts, and BECS/PayTo support for recurring domestic payments.
Bundles scheduling, payments, waitlists, a member shop, and an iPad check-in kiosk into one platform instead of requiring several separate tools.
Cons
A percentage-of-revenue pricing model could cost high-volume studios more over time than a comparable flat monthly subscription.
Positioning, payment rails, and hosting are explicitly Australia-focused, which may make it a less natural fit for studios outside Australia.
No independent customer testimonials, case studies, or third-party reviews were visible on the marketing site to verify real-world outcomes.