Compare AdminMart and Avocode on pricing, features, platforms, and ratings — both Design tools, freemium vs subscription pricing to decide which fits your team.
At a Glance
AdminMart
Avocode
Primary category
Design
Design
Rating
Not documented
Not documented
Pricing model
freemium
subscription
Starting price
Free templates available; premium templates start around 49 dollars as a one-time purchase
Not documented
Free plan
Not documented
Not documented
Free trial
Not documented
Not documented
Platforms
Not documented
Not documented
Team collaboration
Not documented
Not documented
AI features
Not documented
Not documented
Public API
Not documented
Not documented
Pricing Compared
Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.
AdminMart
Free Template — 0 one-time
Premium Single Template — Around 49 dollars one-time
Multi-Template Bundle — Discounted bundle pricing, varies by promotion one-time
Avocode
No individual plan breakdown documented yet.
Pros & Cons
AdminMart
Pros
Wide framework coverage means teams rarely need to change their stack to use a template
Genuinely usable free versions let developers evaluate quality before paying
One-time pricing is inexpensive compared to the cost of building a dashboard shell from scratch
Bundle deals lower the per-template cost for agencies that need several dashboards
Templates are actively maintained and updated for newer framework versions
Cons
Not a hosted product; developers still need to integrate, deploy, and maintain the code themselves
Customizing branding and business logic beyond the demo still requires front-end development skill
Focused narrowly on dashboard and admin-panel use cases rather than general website templates
Support is scoped to the purchased template rather than ongoing custom development help
Avocode
Pros
Historically well-regarded for accurate, multi-tool design file inspection
Founding team had prior credibility from the popular CSS Hat plugin
Reduced friction between designers and developers before native handoff tools existed in Figma
Cons
Discontinued: sunset by Ceros on October 1, 2023 and no longer available for purchase
No ongoing support, updates, or new account signups
Existing users must migrate to alternative tools such as Figma Dev Mode, Zeplin, or UXPin
Historical pricing and feature details are difficult to verify precisely from current sources
Use Cases
AdminMart
Fast SaaS dashboard MVP — Startup founders and small engineering teams use AdminMart templates to stand up a working admin panel or customer dashboard quickly instead of building UI from scratch.
Client admin panels for agencies — Web development agencies use AdminMart templates as a starting point for client back-office tools, reducing delivery time on repetitive dashboard builds.
Learning modern dashboard UI patterns — Students and solo developers use the free template versions to study component architecture and dashboard layout conventions in React, Angular, or Vue.
Avocode
Historical design-to-development handoff — Development teams previously used Avocode to inspect designer-created files and extract implementation-ready specs and code.
Cross-tool design collaboration — Teams using a mix of Sketch, Photoshop, XD, or Figma previously used Avocode as a common inspection layer across file types.
Migrating away from Avocode — Teams that previously relied on Avocode now need to evaluate and migrate to an active alternative such as Figma Dev Mode or Zeplin.