Compare Avocode and ai-datalayer on pricing, features, platforms, and ratings — both Design tools, subscription vs Freemium subscription: free trial (1 site,…
At a Glance
Avocode
ai-datalayer
Primary category
Design
Design
Rating
Not documented
Not documented
Pricing model
subscription
Freemium subscription: free trial (1 site, 10 analyses/month, no card required), then paid monthly plans from £12/month (Starter) up to £45/month (Pro, 10 sites), plus optional pay-as-you-go credit add-on packs.
Starting price
Not documented
Not documented
Free plan
Not documented
Yes
Free trial
Not documented
Yes
Platforms
Not documented
Not documented
Team collaboration
Not documented
Not documented
AI features
Not documented
Yes
Public API
Not documented
Yes
Pricing Compared
Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.
Avocode
No individual plan breakdown documented yet.
ai-datalayer
No individual plan breakdown documented yet.
Pros & Cons
Avocode
Pros
Historically well-regarded for accurate, multi-tool design file inspection
Founding team had prior credibility from the popular CSS Hat plugin
Reduced friction between designers and developers before native handoff tools existed in Figma
Cons
Discontinued: sunset by Ceros on October 1, 2023 and no longer available for purchase
No ongoing support, updates, or new account signups
Existing users must migrate to alternative tools such as Figma Dev Mode, Zeplin, or UXPin
Historical pricing and feature details are difficult to verify precisely from current sources
ai-datalayer
Pros
Native WordPress integration (Gutenberg panel, dashboard widget, admin bar) with a simple three-step onboarding flow
Publishes AI-readable endpoints (/llms.txt, REST API, MCP server) and structured data fact-checked against Wikidata to reduce hallucinated entities
Free tier (1 site, 10 analyses/month) lets site owners test the product with no credit card before committing to a paid plan
Manual review workflow lets editors approve, reject, or edit generated entities, schema, and FAQs before they go live
Detects and defers to existing SEO plugins like Yoast and Rank Math instead of conflicting with them
Cons
WordPress-only — teams on other CMS platforms or custom-built sites cannot use it
Monthly analysis allowances are capped on every tier (up to 400/month on the top Pro plan), which may limit coverage for large content libraries
No enterprise or custom-pricing tier is publicly listed for agencies managing many client sites beyond the 10-site Pro plan
Cancellations take effect only at the end of the current billing period with no partial refunds
Use Cases
Avocode
Historical design-to-development handoff — Development teams previously used Avocode to inspect designer-created files and extract implementation-ready specs and code.
Cross-tool design collaboration — Teams using a mix of Sketch, Photoshop, XD, or Figma previously used Avocode as a common inspection layer across file types.
Migrating away from Avocode — Teams that previously relied on Avocode now need to evaluate and migrate to an active alternative such as Figma Dev Mode or Zeplin.