Amazon Q Developer vs Cursor

Compare Amazon Q Developer and Cursor on pricing, features, platforms, and ratings — both AI Coding tools, Freemium pricing to decide which fits your team.

At a Glance

 Amazon Q DeveloperCursor
Primary categoryAI CodingAI Coding
RatingNot documentedNot documented
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemium
Starting priceFree (Pro plan from $19/user/month)Free
Free planYesYes
Free trialNot documentedNot documented
PlatformsWindowsMac, Windows
Team collaborationNot documentedNot documented
AI featuresYesYes
Public APIYesYes

Pricing Compared

Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.

Amazon Q Developer

Free — $0/month monthly
Pro — $19/user/month monthly

Cursor

Hobby — Free N/A
Individual — $16/month monthly
Teams — $32/user/month monthly
Enterprise — Custom annual

Pros & Cons

Amazon Q Developer

Pros

  • Free tier available with no cost to start
  • Deep integration with AWS services and the AWS Management Console
  • Agentic capabilities go beyond autocomplete into test generation and code review
  • Supports legacy application modernization (.NET and Java transformation)

Cons

  • Deepest value is realized within the AWS ecosystem, less compelling for non-AWS shops
  • Free tier usage limits (50 agentic interactions/month) are relatively low for heavy users
  • Per-user Pro pricing can add up for larger engineering teams

Cursor

Pros

  • Deeply integrated, codebase-aware AI agent rather than a bolt-on chat sidebar
  • Access to multiple frontier models instead of being locked to one provider
  • Familiar VS Code-based interface with compatible extensions and shortcuts
  • Free Hobby tier makes it easy to try before committing to a paid plan

Cons

  • Usage-based billing changes have previously caused unexpected charges for some users
  • Heavy agentic use can consume model usage quickly, requiring plan upgrades
  • Enterprise-grade governance features require a custom-priced Enterprise plan
  • Ongoing acquisition by SpaceX introduces some uncertainty about the product's long-term roadmap and ownership

Use Cases

Amazon Q Developer

  • AI-assisted coding — Get real-time code suggestions and completions while writing software in supported IDEs.
  • Legacy application modernization — Use application transformation features to port .NET applications or upgrade Java versions at scale.
  • Automated code review and testing — Use agentic capabilities to generate unit tests and perform code reviews automatically.

Cursor

  • Individual developer productivity — Solo developers use Cursor's Tab autocomplete and Agent mode to write and refactor code faster inside a familiar VS Code-based editor.
  • Team code review automation — Engineering teams use Bugbot to automatically flag likely bugs in pull requests before human review.
  • Enterprise-governed AI coding — Large organizations deploy Cursor Enterprise with SCIM, audit logs, and access controls to safely roll out AI coding assistance across many engineers.

Read the full Amazon Q Developer review · Read the full Cursor review