Cursor vs Bolt.new

Compare Cursor and Bolt.new on pricing, features, platforms, and ratings — both AI Coding tools, Freemium vs Usage-based pricing to decide which fits your team.

At a Glance

 CursorBolt.new
Primary categoryAI CodingAI Coding
RatingNot documentedNot documented
Pricing modelFreemiumUsage-based
Starting priceFreeFree
Free planYesYes
Free trialNot documentedYes
PlatformsMac, WindowsWeb
Team collaborationNot documentedNot documented
AI featuresYesYes
Public APIYesYes

Pricing Compared

Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.

Cursor

Hobby — Free N/A
Individual — $16/month monthly
Teams — $32/user/month monthly
Enterprise — Custom annual

Bolt.new

Free — $0 monthly
Pro — $20/month monthly
Pro 50 — $50/month monthly
Pro 100 — $100/month monthly
Pro 200 — $200/month monthly

Pros & Cons

Cursor

Pros

  • Deeply integrated, codebase-aware AI agent rather than a bolt-on chat sidebar
  • Access to multiple frontier models instead of being locked to one provider
  • Familiar VS Code-based interface with compatible extensions and shortcuts
  • Free Hobby tier makes it easy to try before committing to a paid plan

Cons

  • Usage-based billing changes have previously caused unexpected charges for some users
  • Heavy agentic use can consume model usage quickly, requiring plan upgrades
  • Enterprise-grade governance features require a custom-priced Enterprise plan
  • Ongoing acquisition by SpaceX introduces some uncertainty about the product's long-term roadmap and ownership

Bolt.new

Pros

  • Generates and runs complete full-stack apps entirely in the browser, no local setup required
  • Free tier available to try the product before subscribing
  • Native integrations with Supabase, GitHub, Netlify, Stripe, and Cloudflare
  • Fast iteration through conversational refinement of generated code

Cons

  • Free tier does not allow exporting the generated project
  • Token-based pricing can be hard to predict for larger or more complex projects
  • Browser-based execution can hit performance limits on very large projects
  • Higher usage tiers ($50-$200/month) are needed for serious ongoing development

Use Cases

Cursor

  • Individual developer productivity — Solo developers use Cursor's Tab autocomplete and Agent mode to write and refactor code faster inside a familiar VS Code-based editor.
  • Team code review automation — Engineering teams use Bugbot to automatically flag likely bugs in pull requests before human review.
  • Enterprise-governed AI coding — Large organizations deploy Cursor Enterprise with SCIM, audit logs, and access controls to safely roll out AI coding assistance across many engineers.

Bolt.new

  • Rapid prototyping — Founders and product teams turn an idea into a working full-stack prototype from a single prompt.
  • No-code app building — Non-developers build functional web apps and internal tools without writing code manually.
  • Developer scaffolding — Developers use Bolt.new to quickly scaffold a full-stack project structure, then continue editing by hand.

Read the full Cursor review · Read the full Bolt.new review