Compare BigMarker and Zuddl on pricing, features, platforms, and ratings — both Video Conferencing tools, Subscription vs custom pricing to decide which fits…
At a Glance
BigMarker
Zuddl
Primary category
Video Conferencing
Video Conferencing
Rating
Not documented
Not documented
Pricing model
Subscription
custom
Starting price
Custom pricing (contact sales)
Custom pricing based on event format and attendee volume
Free plan
Not documented
Not documented
Free trial
Not documented
Not documented
Platforms
Web, iOS, Android
Web
Team collaboration
Not documented
Not documented
AI features
Yes
Yes
Public API
Yes
Not documented
Pricing Compared
Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.
BigMarker
Basic — Custom (contact sales) annual
Enterprise — Custom (contact sales) annual
Enterprise+ — Custom (contact sales) annual
Zuddl
Webinar — Approximately 10,000 dollars per year (estimated) annual
Conferences — Approximately 12,000 dollars per year (estimated) annual
Custom / Enterprise — Custom annual
Pros & Cons
BigMarker
Pros
No software download required for attendees, lowering the barrier to join
Supports a wide range of webinar formats, including evergreen and simulive for scaling content
Handles very large events (up to 500,000 attendees on the top tier)
Deep white-labeling and enterprise security options (SSO, MFA, custom domains) at the top tier
Cons
No public self-serve pricing; every tier requires a sales conversation
5% transaction fee applies to paid ticketed events
Advanced features like API access and breakout rooms are locked behind Enterprise tiers
Entry-level Basic tier caps webcams and host licenses fairly low compared to Enterprise
Zuddl
Pros
Broadcast-quality Studio production without needing external production teams
Strong bi-directional CRM integration ties events directly to pipeline reporting
Scales from small webinars to conferences with tens of thousands of attendees
Modular platform covers virtual, hybrid, and in-person formats in one system
AI-powered matchmaking supports more meaningful attendee networking
Cons
No public self-serve pricing; requires a custom sales quote
Reported starting costs (thousands of dollars per year) may be out of reach for very small organizations
As a newer company (founded 2020), it has a smaller track record than legacy event platforms
Advanced production and CRM features likely require higher-tier plans not detailed publicly
Use Cases
BigMarker
Lead-generation webinars — Marketing teams run live and evergreen webinars with registration pages and CRM integration to generate leads.
Corporate training and enablement — Training teams use recurring or automated webinar channels to deliver consistent onboarding and enablement content.
Large virtual and hybrid conferences — Event organizers run large-scale virtual or hybrid conferences using breakout rooms, ticketing, and white-labeled branding.
Zuddl
Large-scale B2B conferences — Organizers run multi-day conferences with thousands of attendees, combining live production with exhibitor booths and networking.
Pipeline-driven webinars — Marketing teams run webinar programs that sync attendee data directly into CRM and marketing automation for lead scoring.
Hybrid field events — Organizations combine in-person attendance with a virtual audience for regional field events and user conferences.