ghost vs havenweb

Compare ghost and havenweb on pricing, features, platforms, and ratings — both Content Marketing tools, Freemium (open-source self-hosted plus paid managed…

At a Glance

 ghosthavenweb
Primary categoryContent MarketingContent Marketing
RatingNot documentedNot documented
Pricing modelFreemium (open-source self-hosted plus paid managed hosting)Open Source / Freemium
Starting priceFree (self-hosted); Ghost(Pro) from $18/monthFree (self-hosted)
Free planYesYes
Free trialYesNot documented
PlatformsNot documentedWeb
Team collaborationNot documentedNot documented
AI featuresNot documentedNot documented
Public APIYesNot documented

Pricing Compared

Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.

ghost

Self-hosted (open source) — Free N/A
Starter (Ghost(Pro)) — $18/month Billed yearly
Publisher (Ghost(Pro)) — $29/month Billed yearly
Business (Ghost(Pro)) — $199/month Billed yearly
Custom (Ghost(Pro)) — Contact for pricing Custom

havenweb

Self-hosted — Free N/A
Hosted — $5/month Monthly
Fully Managed — Custom Contact for pricing

Pros & Cons

ghost

Pros

  • Fully open source (MIT license) with a free self-hosting option and no vendor lock-in
  • Native paid membership and newsletter monetization without needing extra plugins
  • Nonprofit governance structure makes the platform structurally resistant to acquisition or shutdown
  • Lean, fast, publishing-focused architecture compared to general-purpose CMS platforms
  • Headless API supports fully custom frontends for developer teams

Cons

  • Less flexible than WordPress for building non-publishing websites (e-commerce stores, complex layouts)
  • Self-hosting requires technical setup and ongoing maintenance (Node.js, database, email deliverability)
  • Ghost(Pro) Business and Enterprise tiers are considerably pricier than many newsletter-only competitors
  • Smaller plugin/theme ecosystem than WordPress
  • Member limits on lower Ghost(Pro) tiers can require upgrading as an audience grows

havenweb

Pros

  • Completely free and open source, with no vendor lock-in
  • Genuinely private by design, with no public visibility option and no tracking or ads
  • Lightweight enough to run on very cheap hardware like a Raspberry Pi
  • Simple, focused feature set that avoids the complexity and spam issues of platforms like WordPress
  • Low-cost official hosting option for people who do not want to self-host

Cons

  • Requires comfort with Docker or a willingness to pay for hosting to get started
  • No built-in monetization tools, unlike public blogging platforms such as Substack
  • Small, independent project with no dedicated support team or enterprise SLA
  • Limited discovery: because it is intentionally private, there is no way to grow an audience beyond people you personally invite
  • Feature set is minimal compared to full-featured CMS platforms

Use Cases

ghost

  • Independent newsletter publishing — Writing and monetizing a paid email newsletter with native subscription billing.
  • Membership media sites — Running a publication with multiple paid membership tiers and gated content.
  • Developer-built headless blogs — Using Ghost as an API-driven content backend behind a custom-built frontend.

havenweb

  • Sharing family photos privately — A family member sets up Haven to post photos and updates that only relatives with an account can see, avoiding public social media entirely.
  • Private journaling for a small circle — A writer uses Haven to publish personal reflections or updates to a small group of trusted friends without exposing them to a public audience.
  • Ad-free alternative to social media — Privacy-conscious users replace public social feeds with a self-hosted Haven to control exactly who sees their posts and to avoid ads and tracking.

Read the full ghost review · Read the full havenweb review