grasshopper vs Chatty

Compare grasshopper and Chatty on pricing, features, platforms, and ratings — both Communication tools, Tiered monthly subscription starting at $14/month with…

At a Glance

 grasshopperChatty
Primary categoryCommunicationCommunication
RatingNot documentedNot documented
Pricing modelTiered monthly subscription starting at $14/month with a free trial; USA and Canada onlyFree and open source
Starting priceNot documentedFree
Free planNot documentedNot documented
Free trialYesNot documented
PlatformsiOS, Android, Desktop App, Mobile AppNot documented
Team collaborationNot documentedNot documented
AI featuresNot documentedNot documented
Public APINot documentedNot documented

Pricing Compared

Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.

grasshopper

No individual plan breakdown documented yet.

Chatty

No individual plan breakdown documented yet.

Pros & Cons

grasshopper

Pros

  • No hardware required — works as an app layer over an existing mobile phone or landline
  • Choice of local, toll-free, or vanity business numbers with unlimited extensions on higher plans
  • Voicemail transcription and instant automated text replies help solo operators stay responsive
  • Backed by GoTo, an established communications company, for platform stability and support
  • Free trial available to test the service before committing to a paid plan

Cons

  • Service is only available in the USA and Canada, limiting use for international businesses
  • Focused on number/call/text management rather than a full VoIP PBX, so it lacks the deeper call-center and analytics depth of platforms built for larger support teams
  • Advanced features like the virtual receptionist and extra phone numbers are positioned as paid add-ons rather than included in base pricing
  • Requires a stable Wi-Fi or data connection since calls route over VoIP rather than a traditional carrier line

Chatty

Pros

  • Completely free with no subscription, ads, or paid tiers
  • Genuinely cross-platform via Java, running on Windows, macOS, and Linux
  • Unique in-client tools for streamers to update title, game, and tags without a browser
  • Long-running, mature project with community translations into several languages
  • Portable version removes the need to separately install a Java runtime

Cons

  • Java-based architecture and IRC-style interface can feel dated compared to newer, more modern-looking clients
  • Less actively marketed and may be less well known than alternatives like Chatterino
  • Requires a Java runtime unless using the bundled portable package, adding setup friction for some users
  • Third-party emote service support and customization depth may lag behind newer competing clients
  • As a community-maintained tool, update cadence depends on volunteer developer availability

Use Cases

grasshopper

Chatty

  • Lightweight multi-channel chat viewing — Viewers who follow multiple Twitch channels use Chatty's tabbed interface to keep several chats organized in one lightweight desktop app.
  • In-chat stream management for streamers — Streamers use Chatty to update their stream title, category, and tags and trigger commercials without switching to a browser dashboard.
  • Cross-platform, low-resource chat client — Users on older or lower-powered machines choose Chatty for a lighter-weight alternative to running Twitch chat in a full browser tab.

Read the full grasshopper review · Read the full Chatty review