Harver vs Factorial

Compare Harver and Factorial on pricing, features, platforms, and ratings — both HR tools, Contact for pricing vs Freemium / Modular Subscription pricing to…

At a Glance

 HarverFactorial
Primary categoryHRHR
RatingNot documentedNot documented
Pricing modelContact for pricingFreemium / Modular Subscription
Starting priceNot documentedFree plan available; paid plans start from around $8 per user per month
Free planNot documentedYes
Free trialNot documentedYes
PlatformsWebWeb, iOS, Android
Team collaborationNot documentedNot documented
AI featuresYesYes
Public APINot documentedYes

Pricing Compared

Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.

Harver

No individual plan breakdown documented yet.

Factorial

Free — $0 Monthly
Core — From $8 per user per month Monthly or annual
Business Hubs (Time, Talent, Finance, IT add-ons) — Custom, priced per hub selected Monthly or annual
Enterprise Hubs — Custom quote Annual

Pros & Cons

Harver

Pros

  • Reduces time-to-hire for high-volume recruiting
  • Science-backed assessments aim to reduce hiring bias
  • Combines assessments, video interviews, and reference checks in one suite
  • Scales to large candidate pools across industries like retail and BPO
  • Backed by acquisitions (Outmatch, pymetrics, Checkster) that broaden its assessment science

Cons

  • Pricing is not published and requires a sales conversation
  • Primarily built for enterprise/high-volume hiring rather than small businesses
  • Assessment-heavy process can add extra steps to the candidate experience
  • Onboarding and configuration may require vendor support

Factorial

Pros

  • Modular hub structure lets small teams start free and only pay for the HR, finance or IT functionality they actually need.
  • Strong fit for European SMBs, with built-in support for EU labor compliance, multiple legal entities and multi-language payslips.
  • Broad functional coverage in one platform, spanning core HR, payroll, recruitment, performance and IT asset management.
  • Native iOS and Android apps give employees self-service access to time off, payslips and schedules from their phones.

Cons

  • No fixed public pricing list for most hubs, so buyers must request a custom quote to know their real cost.
  • The free plan is narrow, limited to document management and e-signature rather than core HRIS functionality.
  • As a modular system, total cost can climb quickly once several hubs are added for a growing headcount.
  • North American presence has been scaled back, with the Miami office closed in late 2024, which may affect support depth for US-based customers.

Use Cases

Harver

  • Volume Hiring for Contact Centers — Screening large applicant pools for contact center and BPO roles using standardized assessments.
  • Retail Seasonal Hiring — Quickly assessing and ranking large numbers of seasonal or hourly retail applicants.
  • Enterprise Structured Interviewing — Standardizing interview and assessment processes across large hiring teams to improve consistency.
  • Bias Reduction in Hiring — Using structured, validated assessments instead of unstructured interviews to reduce hiring bias.

Factorial

  • Centralizing HR records for a growing SMB — A company outgrowing spreadsheets uses Factorial Core to build a single employee directory, digitize onboarding paperwork and manage e-signatures for contracts and policies.
  • Running time off, time tracking and shift scheduling — Operations and office managers use the Time hub to approve absence requests, track clock-in and clock-out data, and publish shift schedules that staff can view on mobile.
  • Hiring and onboarding new employees — Talent teams use the AI-assisted applicant tracking system to post jobs, screen CVs and automate candidate updates, then hand off hired candidates directly into Factorial onboarding workflows.

Read the full Harver review · Read the full Factorial review