Hurl vs Gravitee

Compare Hurl and Gravitee on pricing, features, platforms, and ratings — both API Tools tools, Open Source vs Freemium (open-source Community Edition plus…

At a Glance

 HurlGravitee
Primary categoryAPI ToolsAPI Tools
RatingNot documentedNot documented
Pricing modelOpen SourceFreemium (open-source Community Edition plus tiered commercial plans)
Starting priceFreeFree (Community Edition); paid plans from $1,250/month
Free planNot documentedYes
Free trialNot documentedNot documented
PlatformsMac, WindowsWeb
Team collaborationNot documentedNot documented
AI featuresNot documentedYes
Public APIYesYes

Pricing Compared

Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.

Hurl

Open Source — Free N/A

Gravitee

Community Edition — Free N/A (self-hosted, open source)
Planet — $2,500/month Monthly
Galaxy — Custom Custom
Universe — Custom Custom

Pros & Cons

Hurl

Pros

  • Completely free and open source with no paid tiers or limits
  • Lightweight single binary with no scripting language or GUI required
  • Powerful built-in assertions make it a genuine API testing tool, not just a request runner
  • Plain-text format is easy to version control, review, and diff
  • Backed and actively maintained by Orange with a stable release history since 2020

Cons

  • Smaller plugin and template ecosystem compared to Postman or Insomnia
  • No polished graphical interface, which can be a barrier for non-technical testers
  • Steeper learning curve for complex chained scenarios compared to point-and-click tools
  • Limited built-in mocking or virtualization capabilities
  • Less mainstream brand recognition than established API tools like Postman

Gravitee

Pros

  • Free, actively maintained open-source Community Edition with no artificial feature caps on core gateway functionality
  • Unlimited API calls and events per gateway rather than metered usage pricing, which makes costs predictable at scale
  • Native support for both REST/GraphQL APIs and Kafka-style event streaming in one platform
  • Early, dedicated tooling for governing AI agents and MCP servers rather than bolting AI support onto a legacy product

Cons

  • Commercial tiers above the entry Planet plan require a custom quote, making upfront cost comparison difficult
  • Gateway-based pricing can get expensive quickly for organizations that need many production gateways for isolation
  • Smaller ecosystem and third-party plugin marketplace compared to larger incumbents like Kong or Apigee
  • Self-hosting the Community Edition requires in-house DevOps expertise for scaling and upgrades

Use Cases

Hurl

  • API Testing in CI/CD Pipelines — Run automated HTTP assertion tests on every commit or deployment as part of a build pipeline.
  • Quick HTTP Request Scripting — Script and chain HTTP requests in plain text for debugging or exploring an API without writing code.
  • Contract and Regression Testing — Maintain version-controlled test suites that validate REST and GraphQL API responses over time.

Gravitee

  • Enterprise API governance — Centralizing design, security and monitoring for hundreds of internal and partner-facing APIs behind a consistent gateway and access policy.
  • Event-driven architecture mediation — Applying access control, schema governance and monitoring to Kafka topics and event streams alongside conventional REST APIs.
  • AI agent and MCP governance — Applying rate limits, authentication and observability to AI agents and Model Context Protocol servers as they connect to internal systems.

Read the full Hurl review · Read the full Gravitee review