Hurl vs Kong

Compare Hurl and Kong on pricing, features, platforms, and ratings — both API Tools tools, Open Source vs Freemium pricing to decide which fits your team.

At a Glance

 HurlKong
Primary categoryAPI ToolsAPI Tools
RatingNot documentedNot documented
Pricing modelOpen SourceFreemium
Starting priceFreeFree (open source); paid plans custom-priced
Free planNot documentedYes
Free trialNot documentedYes
PlatformsMac, WindowsNot documented
Team collaborationNot documentedNot documented
AI featuresNot documentedYes
Public APIYesYes

Pricing Compared

Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.

Hurl

Open Source — Free N/A

Kong

Kong Gateway (Open Source) — Free N/A
Konnect Free Trial — $0 for 30 days 30-day trial
Konnect Plus — Custom, billed per gateway monthly Monthly
Konnect Enterprise — Custom pricing Annual

Pros & Cons

Hurl

Pros

  • Completely free and open source with no paid tiers or limits
  • Lightweight single binary with no scripting language or GUI required
  • Powerful built-in assertions make it a genuine API testing tool, not just a request runner
  • Plain-text format is easy to version control, review, and diff
  • Backed and actively maintained by Orange with a stable release history since 2020

Cons

  • Smaller plugin and template ecosystem compared to Postman or Insomnia
  • No polished graphical interface, which can be a barrier for non-technical testers
  • Steeper learning curve for complex chained scenarios compared to point-and-click tools
  • Limited built-in mocking or virtualization capabilities
  • Less mainstream brand recognition than established API tools like Postman

Kong

Pros

  • Open-source Kong Gateway is free, production-ready and widely adopted
  • Unified platform for both traditional API traffic and AI/LLM traffic governance
  • Large plugin ecosystem covers most authentication, security and transformation needs
  • 30-day free trial of Konnect gives full enterprise functionality before committing
  • Backed by significant funding and a mature enterprise support organization

Cons

  • Konnect's per-gateway pricing can become expensive as API programs scale
  • Plugin development and Lua-based customization require specialized expertise
  • Enterprise pricing is not publicly listed and requires a sales conversation
  • Feature set can be more complex to configure than lighter, purpose-built gateways
  • Some advanced governance features are gated behind the Enterprise tier only

Use Cases

Hurl

  • API Testing in CI/CD Pipelines — Run automated HTTP assertion tests on every commit or deployment as part of a build pipeline.
  • Quick HTTP Request Scripting — Script and chain HTTP requests in plain text for debugging or exploring an API without writing code.
  • Contract and Regression Testing — Maintain version-controlled test suites that validate REST and GraphQL API responses over time.

Kong

  • Enterprise API management — Platform teams use Kong Gateway and Konnect to manage authentication, rate limiting and analytics across hundreds of internal and external APIs.
  • AI traffic governance — Teams route LLM calls through Kong's AI Gateway to enforce token quotas, prompt governance and cost control.
  • Microservices connectivity — Organizations use Kong Mesh alongside Kong Gateway to manage service-to-service traffic in Kubernetes environments.

Read the full Hurl review · Read the full Kong review