Hurl vs swiftype

Compare Hurl and swiftype on pricing, features, platforms, and ratings — both API Tools tools, Open Source vs Tiered subscription: Standard $79/mo, Pro…

At a Glance

 Hurlswiftype
Primary categoryAPI ToolsAPI Tools
RatingNot documentedNot documented
Pricing modelOpen SourceTiered subscription: Standard $79/mo, Pro $199/mo, Premium custom-quoted, plus metered add-ons for extra documents/queries/engines/domains; 14-day free trial, no credit card required.
Starting priceFreeNot documented
Free planNot documentedNot documented
Free trialNot documentedNot documented
PlatformsMac, WindowsNot documented
Team collaborationNot documentedNot documented
AI featuresNot documentedNot documented
Public APIYesYes

Pricing Compared

Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.

Hurl

Open Source — Free N/A

swiftype

No individual plan breakdown documented yet.

Pros & Cons

Hurl

Pros

  • Completely free and open source with no paid tiers or limits
  • Lightweight single binary with no scripting language or GUI required
  • Powerful built-in assertions make it a genuine API testing tool, not just a request runner
  • Plain-text format is easy to version control, review, and diff
  • Backed and actively maintained by Orange with a stable release history since 2020

Cons

  • Smaller plugin and template ecosystem compared to Postman or Insomnia
  • No polished graphical interface, which can be a barrier for non-technical testers
  • Steeper learning curve for complex chained scenarios compared to point-and-click tools
  • Limited built-in mocking or virtualization capabilities
  • Less mainstream brand recognition than established API tools like Postman

swiftype

Pros

  • Self-serve setup with a 14-day free trial and no credit card required
  • Crawler-based indexing means no need to build custom search infrastructure
  • Built-in relevance tuning, synonyms, and multilingual support
  • SOC 2 compliant with documented security practices
  • Backed by Elastic, a major search-industry vendor, since its 2017 acquisition

Cons

  • Pricing scales quickly with usage (documents, queries, engines, and domains are all metered add-ons)
  • Standard plan only crawls weekly, which may be too slow for fast-changing content
  • Now a legacy product line under Elastic, whose enterprise search focus has shifted toward App Search/Enterprise Search on the Elastic Stack
  • Enterprise-grade features (dedicated hardware, account manager, custom SLA) are gated behind a custom-quoted Premium plan

Use Cases

Hurl

  • API Testing in CI/CD Pipelines — Run automated HTTP assertion tests on every commit or deployment as part of a build pipeline.
  • Quick HTTP Request Scripting — Script and chain HTTP requests in plain text for debugging or exploring an API without writing code.
  • Contract and Regression Testing — Maintain version-controlled test suites that validate REST and GraphQL API responses over time.

swiftype

Read the full Hurl review · Read the full swiftype review