Mattermost vs Centrifugo

Compare Mattermost and Centrifugo on pricing, features, platforms, and ratings — both Team Chat tools, Freemium vs Open Source / Freemium pricing to decide…

At a Glance

 MattermostCentrifugo
Primary categoryTeam ChatTeam Chat
RatingNot documentedNot documented
Pricing modelFreemiumOpen Source / Freemium
Starting priceFree (Starter, self-hosted); Professional from $10/user/monthFree (self-hosted)
Free planYesYes
Free trialNot documentedNot documented
PlatformsWeb, iOS, Android, Mac, WindowsNot documented
Team collaborationNot documentedNot documented
AI featuresNot documentedNot documented
Public APINot documentedYes

Pricing Compared

Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.

Mattermost

Starter — Free N/A
Professional — $10/user/month annual
Enterprise — Custom annual

Centrifugo

Open Source (Apache 2.0) — Free N/A
Centrifugo PRO — Custom N/A

Pros & Cons

Mattermost

Pros

  • Fully open-source core with self-hosted and air-gapped deployment options
  • Strong fit for regulated industries, government and defense customers
  • Playbooks provide built-in workflow automation not native to Slack
  • Deep integrations with developer and DevOps tooling
  • Lightweight architecture (single Go binary) makes self-hosting comparatively simple

Cons

  • Smaller app/integration marketplace than Slack or Microsoft Teams
  • Enterprise pricing is custom-quoted and not publicly transparent
  • Self-hosting requires ongoing server maintenance and updates
  • UI and mobile experience is generally considered less polished than Slack
  • Annual prepaid billing only for official Professional and Enterprise licenses, no monthly option

Centrifugo

Pros

  • Free, Apache 2.0-licensed core with no per-connection or per-message fees
  • Production-proven at scale by companies including VK, Badoo, ManyChat, and Grafana
  • Supports multiple transports and scaling backends rather than locking teams into one stack
  • Broad official SDK coverage across web, mobile, and backend languages

Cons

  • Requires engineering effort to deploy, secure, and integrate versus a plug-and-play hosted API
  • Centrifugo PRO pricing is not publicly listed, requiring direct contact for enterprise features
  • Self-hosted operation means the adopting team is responsible for uptime, scaling, and monitoring
  • No official company headquarters or large support organization behind the open-source core

Use Cases

Mattermost

  • Incident response and DevOps workflows — Engineering teams use Playbooks to coordinate incident response with automated checklists and dedicated channels.
  • Regulated and government communication — Public-sector and financial-services organizations need self-hosted or air-gapped messaging to meet compliance requirements.
  • Secure internal team chat — Organizations that want Slack-like messaging while keeping full control of where data is stored.

Centrifugo

  • In-App Chat & Live Comments — Development teams use Centrifugo to power real-time chat and live comment features without depending on a hosted third-party API.
  • AI Response Streaming — Applications use Centrifugo to stream partial LLM/AI responses to clients as they are generated.

Read the full Mattermost review · Read the full Centrifugo review