Openmeetings vs klaxoon

Compare Openmeetings and klaxoon on pricing, features, platforms, and ratings — both Collaboration tools, Open Source vs Freemium with a $24.90/host/month…

At a Glance

 Openmeetingsklaxoon
Primary categoryCollaborationCollaboration
RatingNot documentedNot documented
Pricing modelOpen SourceFreemium with a $24.90/host/month Starter plan (billed annually) and custom-quote Enterprise tier
Starting priceFreeNot documented
Free planNot documentedNot documented
Free trialNot documentedNot documented
PlatformsWebNot documented
Team collaborationNot documentedNot documented
AI featuresNot documentedYes
Public APINot documentedNot documented

Pricing Compared

Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.

Openmeetings

Open Source (Self-Hosted) — Free N/A

klaxoon

No individual plan breakdown documented yet.

Pros & Cons

Openmeetings

Pros

  • Completely free and open source under the Apache License
  • Self-hostable for full control over meeting data and privacy
  • No per-user licensing fees regardless of meeting size
  • HTML5-based with no plugin requirements
  • Integrates with enterprise identity systems via LDAP and OAuth2

Cons

  • User interface is dated compared to modern tools like Zoom or Google Meet
  • Self-hosting requires server and media infrastructure expertise (Kurento setup)
  • Smaller community and slower release cadence than commercial competitors
  • Mobile experience is more limited than native mobile conferencing apps
  • Documentation can be sparse for advanced configuration scenarios

klaxoon

Pros

  • Large library of 200+ ready-to-use templates for agile ceremonies, retrospectives, and workshops
  • AI features (summarize, classify, translate, generate action plans) included on paid plans
  • Deep native integrations with Microsoft Teams, Google Workspace, Jira, Wrike, and Adobe Creative Cloud
  • Enterprise-grade admin controls including SAML 2.0 SSO and data residency options (EMEA/US)
  • Backed by Wrike/Citrix following the 2025 acquisition, adding task-management workflow continuity

Cons

  • Free plan is very limited (1 open activity, 5 editing participants, 500 MB storage)
  • Enterprise pricing is custom/quote-based, requiring a sales conversation for full feature access
  • AI features are capped by monthly action quotas, with extra usage sold as add-on packages
  • Recent rebrand to "Klaxoon by Wrike" may create uncertainty about the product's long-term standalone roadmap

Use Cases

Openmeetings

  • Online education and training — Educational institutions host online classes and training sessions using Openmeetings' whiteboard and recording features.
  • Self-hosted enterprise conferencing — Enterprises that require full data control deploy Openmeetings on their own infrastructure instead of using SaaS conferencing tools.
  • Embedded white-label conferencing — Developers use Openmeetings' REST and SOAP APIs to embed video conferencing into their own websites or products.

klaxoon

Read the full Openmeetings review · Read the full klaxoon review