Restream vs Galene

Compare Restream and Galene on pricing, features, platforms, and ratings — both Video Conferencing tools, Freemium subscription, monthly or annual billing vs…

At a Glance

 RestreamGalene
Primary categoryVideo ConferencingVideo Conferencing
RatingNot documentedNot documented
Pricing modelFreemium subscription, monthly or annual billingOpen Source
Starting priceFree (2 channels); paid plans start at $19/month, or $16/month billed annuallyFree
Free planYesNot documented
Free trialNot documentedNot documented
PlatformsWebWeb, Android, Mac, Windows
Team collaborationNot documentedNot documented
AI featuresYesNot documented
Public APIYesYes

Pricing Compared

Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.

Restream

Free — $0 free
Standard — $19/month ($16/month annual) monthly or annual
Professional — $49/month ($39/month annual) monthly or annual
Business — $239/month ($199/month annual) monthly or annual
Enterprise — Custom custom

Galene

Self-Hosted (Open Source) — Free N/A - one-time download, self-hosted

Pros & Cons

Restream

Pros

  • Broadcasts to 30+ platforms simultaneously from one dashboard
  • Browser-based Restream Studio needs no separate broadcasting software
  • Free plan available for testing with 2 simultaneous channels
  • Cloud recording and analytics included on paid plans
  • Supports multi-guest, multi-camera live production

Cons

  • Free plan includes Restream branding and a watermark
  • Channel limits scale with price, so reaching many destinations gets expensive
  • Clips, the AI short-form repurposing feature, is a separate paid add-on
  • Higher-tier features like SRT ingest and the website player require the Business plan
  • Employee and company-size figures vary across third-party data sources

Galene

Pros

  • Free and MIT-licensed, with full source code access and no vendor lock-in
  • Very low CPU and RAM footprint compared to many comparable SFUs
  • Cross-platform server support across Linux, macOS, Windows and ARM devices
  • Actively maintained with funded development and an independent security review
  • Proven in production at major universities and open-source conferences

Cons

  • No official managed or hosted SaaS option; self-hosting is required
  • Requires system administration skills to deploy and maintain
  • User interface is more minimal than commercial tools like Zoom or Google Meet
  • Many-to-many meetings scale quadratically, limiting very large all-camera calls
  • Smaller community and fewer integrations than Jitsi Meet

Use Cases

Restream

  • Independent streamers and podcasters — Multistream live shows to YouTube, Twitch, and X simultaneously to reach a wider audience.
  • Business webinars and product launches — Broadcast webinars and launches across multiple platforms at once to maximize reach.
  • Browser-based multi-guest production — Produce live, multi-guest shows using Restream Studio without extra broadcasting software.

Galene

  • University lecture and remote examination platform — Originally built for and still used to deliver lectures, tutorials and supervised remote exams at Universite Paris Cite and Sorbonne Universite.
  • Conference and community event streaming — Used to host free-software and academic conferences such as LibrePlanet 2024 and JFLA 2021, letting organizers avoid proprietary conferencing platforms.
  • Privacy-conscious self-hosted meetings — Deployed by organizations that want full control over meeting data and infrastructure instead of relying on a third-party video SaaS.

Read the full Restream review · Read the full Galene review