Compare SeaTable and Bravo Studio on pricing, features, platforms, and ratings — both No-Code tools, Freemium SaaS with per-user paid tiers, plus on-premises…
At a Glance
SeaTable
Bravo Studio
Primary category
No-Code
No-Code
Rating
Not documented
Not documented
Pricing model
Freemium SaaS with per-user paid tiers, plus on-premises server licenses
Freemium
Starting price
Free for up to 25 users; Plus plan from 7 euros per user per month, billed annually
Free (paid plans from $22/month)
Free plan
Yes
Yes
Free trial
Not documented
Yes
Platforms
Web
Web, iOS, Android
Team collaboration
Not documented
Not documented
AI features
Yes
Yes
Public API
Yes
Yes
Pricing Compared
Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.
SeaTable
Free — 0 euros N/A
Plus — 7 euros per user per month (annual) or 9 euros per user per month (monthly) Monthly or annual
Enterprise — 14 euros per user per month (annual) or 18 euros per user per month (monthly) Monthly or annual
Dedicated Cloud — Custom quote Contact sales
Bravo Studio
Starter — Free N/A
Solo — $22/month monthly
Pros & Cons
SeaTable
Pros
Free plan supports up to 25 users, generous for small teams compared to many no-code competitors
Strong data residency positioning with cloud data stored exclusively in German data centers
On-premises server licenses available for organizations that need full self-hosting control
Python scripting allows more advanced customization than a purely no-code interface
Transparent, published per-user pricing for Free, Plus, and Enterprise tiers
Cons
Free plan row and storage limits (10,000 rows, 2 gigabytes) are modest for larger datasets
SAML single sign-on is reserved for the Enterprise tier
Dedicated Cloud plan requires a minimum of 100 users, out of reach for smaller organizations
Smaller ecosystem of templates and integrations compared to larger no-code competitors like Airtable
AI credit allowances on lower tiers are limited (12.5 to 50 credits) for AI-assisted features
Bravo Studio
Pros
No coding required to ship a real native app starting from a Figma design
Direct integration with popular backend/data tools (Airtable, Firebase, Supabase, Xano)
Built-in monetization via Stripe and RevenueCat
Bravo MCP lets teams build apps conversationally inside existing AI subscriptions
Free tier available to prototype before paying
Cons
Free plan caps apps at 15 screens and doesn't support app store publishing
Requires a Figma design as a starting point, so non-designers face a learning curve
Complex custom backend logic beyond the supported integrations isn't well supported
Bravo MCP / Bravo 4.0 workflow is still in beta as of 2026
Use Cases
SeaTable
GDPR-compliant project and data management — European organizations with strict data residency requirements use SeaTable Cloud because data is stored exclusively in German data centers.
Self-hosted internal database applications — IT teams deploy SeaTable Server on-premises to build internal no-code database applications while keeping full control of infrastructure.
Small team workflow and data tracking — Small teams of up to 25 users use SeaTable's Free plan to build custom tables and automations for tracking projects, inventory, or contacts.
Bravo Studio
Startup MVP Validation — Solo founders and small teams turn a Figma prototype into a real, installable app to test with early users.
Agency Client App Delivery — Design agencies use Bravo Studio to deliver working native apps directly from client Figma files.
Internal & Membership Apps — Small businesses build internal tools or membership apps wired to Airtable or Supabase without hiring developers.