Tine vs SOGo

Compare Tine and SOGo on pricing, features, platforms, and ratings — both Collaboration tools, open-source pricing to decide which fits your team.

At a Glance

 TineSOGo
Primary categoryCollaborationCollaboration
RatingNot documentedNot documented
Pricing modelopen-sourceopen-source
Starting priceFree (self-hosted); hosted plans from EUR 12.90/monthFree
Free planYesNot documented
Free trialNot documentedNot documented
PlatformsWebWeb, iOS, Android
Team collaborationNot documentedNot documented
AI featuresNot documentedNot documented
Public APIYesYes

Pricing Compared

Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.

Tine

Self-Hosted Business Edition — Free N/A (self-hosted, optional paid support)
Hosted Groupware — EUR 12.90/month monthly
Hosted Pro — EUR 24.90/month monthly

SOGo

Self-Hosted (Open Source) — Free N/A
Commercial Support (via Alinto) — Custom pricing Contract

Pros & Cons

Tine

Pros

  • Fully open-source under AGPLv3, including features normally reserved for paid enterprise tiers elsewhere
  • Combines groupware and CRM in one suite, reducing the need for separate tools
  • Free to self-host with no per-user licensing cost
  • Long track record, with continuous development since 2008
  • Managed hosting option available for teams that do not want to self-administer a server

Cons

  • Smaller community and ecosystem compared to mainstream groupware platforms like Zimbra or Nextcloud
  • Interface and documentation are less polished than large commercial competitors
  • Self-hosting requires PHP and SQL server administration skills
  • Primarily documented and supported in German and English, which may limit reach in other markets
  • Hosted SaaS pricing scales per user and per gigabyte, which can add up for larger teams

SOGo

Pros

  • Free and open source with no per-user licensing cost for the core server
  • Broad native client support through CalDAV, CardDAV, and ActiveSync
  • Integrates with existing LDAP, Active Directory, and IMAP infrastructure
  • Proven at scale in production environments with thousands of mailboxes
  • Active commercial steward (Alinto) available for organizations that want paid support

Cons

  • Requires in-house IT expertise or a paid support contract to install, secure, and maintain
  • Web interface looks dated compared to modern SaaS email clients
  • No official cloud-hosted SaaS version directly from the core project, only third-party hosting
  • Documentation can be technical and geared toward system administrators rather than end users

Use Cases

Tine

  • Self-hosted email and calendar collaboration — Organizations that want full control over their email and calendar data self-host Tine on their own servers instead of relying on a third-party SaaS provider.
  • Combined groupware and CRM for small businesses — Small and mid-sized businesses use Tine's built-in CRM alongside its groupware modules to manage both internal collaboration and customer relationships in one system.
  • Open-source alternative to proprietary groupware — Organizations that require fully auditable, open-source software for compliance or budget reasons choose Tine over closed-source suites like Microsoft Exchange or Zimbra's proprietary tiers.

SOGo

  • Self-Hosted Business Email — Small and mid-size businesses replace hosted email suites with a self-hosted SOGo server for full control over data and infrastructure.
  • ISP and Hosting Provider Webmail — Hosting providers deploy SOGo to offer webmail, calendar, and contact services to thousands of customer mailboxes across multiple domains.
  • Exchange Alternative for Regulated Industries — Organizations with data residency or compliance requirements use SOGo to keep email and calendar data on infrastructure they control.

Read the full Tine review · Read the full SOGo review