Openmeetings vs Tine

Compare Openmeetings and Tine on pricing, features, platforms, and ratings — both Collaboration tools, Open Source vs open-source pricing to decide which fits…

At a Glance

 OpenmeetingsTine
Primary categoryCollaborationCollaboration
RatingNot documentedNot documented
Pricing modelOpen Sourceopen-source
Starting priceFreeFree (self-hosted); hosted plans from EUR 12.90/month
Free planNot documentedYes
Free trialNot documentedNot documented
PlatformsWebWeb
Team collaborationNot documentedNot documented
AI featuresNot documentedNot documented
Public APINot documentedYes

Pricing Compared

Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.

Openmeetings

Open Source (Self-Hosted) — Free N/A

Tine

Self-Hosted Business Edition — Free N/A (self-hosted, optional paid support)
Hosted Groupware — EUR 12.90/month monthly
Hosted Pro — EUR 24.90/month monthly

Pros & Cons

Openmeetings

Pros

  • Completely free and open source under the Apache License
  • Self-hostable for full control over meeting data and privacy
  • No per-user licensing fees regardless of meeting size
  • HTML5-based with no plugin requirements
  • Integrates with enterprise identity systems via LDAP and OAuth2

Cons

  • User interface is dated compared to modern tools like Zoom or Google Meet
  • Self-hosting requires server and media infrastructure expertise (Kurento setup)
  • Smaller community and slower release cadence than commercial competitors
  • Mobile experience is more limited than native mobile conferencing apps
  • Documentation can be sparse for advanced configuration scenarios

Tine

Pros

  • Fully open-source under AGPLv3, including features normally reserved for paid enterprise tiers elsewhere
  • Combines groupware and CRM in one suite, reducing the need for separate tools
  • Free to self-host with no per-user licensing cost
  • Long track record, with continuous development since 2008
  • Managed hosting option available for teams that do not want to self-administer a server

Cons

  • Smaller community and ecosystem compared to mainstream groupware platforms like Zimbra or Nextcloud
  • Interface and documentation are less polished than large commercial competitors
  • Self-hosting requires PHP and SQL server administration skills
  • Primarily documented and supported in German and English, which may limit reach in other markets
  • Hosted SaaS pricing scales per user and per gigabyte, which can add up for larger teams

Use Cases

Openmeetings

  • Online education and training — Educational institutions host online classes and training sessions using Openmeetings' whiteboard and recording features.
  • Self-hosted enterprise conferencing — Enterprises that require full data control deploy Openmeetings on their own infrastructure instead of using SaaS conferencing tools.
  • Embedded white-label conferencing — Developers use Openmeetings' REST and SOAP APIs to embed video conferencing into their own websites or products.

Tine

  • Self-hosted email and calendar collaboration — Organizations that want full control over their email and calendar data self-host Tine on their own servers instead of relying on a third-party SaaS provider.
  • Combined groupware and CRM for small businesses — Small and mid-sized businesses use Tine's built-in CRM alongside its groupware modules to manage both internal collaboration and customer relationships in one system.
  • Open-source alternative to proprietary groupware — Organizations that require fully auditable, open-source software for compliance or budget reasons choose Tine over closed-source suites like Microsoft Exchange or Zimbra's proprietary tiers.

Read the full Openmeetings review · Read the full Tine review