Dgraph vs SurrealDB

Dgraph is a focused, fully open-source graph database with a native GraphQL API and no commercial pricing to evaluate, while SurrealDB is a multi-model…

Best for Dgraph: Teams that specifically need a graph database with native GraphQL access, are comfortable self-hosting under Apache 2.0, and don't require a vendor-managed cloud or published SLA.
Best for SurrealDB: Teams that want to consolidate document, graph, vector, and relational workloads into one engine, need AI/RAG-oriented features like agent memory and knowledge graphs, and want the option of an hourly-billed managed cloud or a custom Enterprise plan with SSO and audit logging.

At a Glance

 DgraphSurrealDB
Primary categoryDatabasesDatabases
RatingNot documentedNot documented
Pricing modelFree/Open Source with paid Cloud tiersfreemium
Starting priceFreeFree
Free planYesYes
Free trialNot documentedNot documented
PlatformsNot documentedNot documented
Team collaborationNot documentedNot documented
AI featuresNot documentedYes
Public APIYesYes

Key Differences

Data model scope

Dgraph: Purpose-built graph database with a native GraphQL API, property-graph queries, full-text search, regex matching, and geo search.

SurrealDB: Multi-model engine unifying document, graph, vector, time-series, and relational data through a single query language, SurrealQL.

Teams with a single, well-defined graph workload get a lean fit from Dgraph, while teams juggling several data shapes can avoid standing up multiple specialized databases with SurrealDB.

Commercial backing and managed hosting

Dgraph: No published pricing and no confirmed active managed cloud offering; project ownership has moved from Dgraph Labs to Hypermode to Istari Digital.

SurrealDB: Publishes an hourly-priced Start (free forever, 1 instance/1GB) and Scale plan, plus a custom Enterprise tier with SSO, audit logging, and FIPS-compliant cryptography.

Organizations that need a vendor support contract, SLA, or managed hosting option can't currently rely on Dgraph's commercial status, whereas SurrealDB offers a documented path from free to enterprise.

AI and agent-memory tooling

Dgraph: No AI or agent-memory features are documented.

SurrealDB: Includes Spectron, a built-in agent memory system with entity extraction and knowledge graph construction, plus hybrid RAG and vector search.

Teams building AI agents or RAG pipelines get purpose-built primitives from SurrealDB that Dgraph does not offer.

Licensing and deployment model

Dgraph: Apache 2.0 open source, self-hosted only, with no company or pricing page to evaluate.

SurrealDB: Freemium model combining a free self-hosted-capable Start tier with paid hourly cloud plans and a custom self-hosted Enterprise option.

Dgraph is a pure self-hosting decision; SurrealDB lets teams start free, move to paid cloud, or self-host at the Enterprise tier as needs grow.

Feature-by-Feature

Core Data Model

FeatureDgraphSurrealDB
Native graph queriesAvailableAvailable
Native GraphQL APIAvailableNot documented
Multi-model (document/vector/time-series/relational)UnavailableAvailable
ACID transactionsAvailableAvailable
Live/real-time queriesNot documentedAvailable

Pricing & Commercial Support

FeatureDgraphSurrealDB
Free/open-source self-hostingAvailableAvailable
Managed cloud offeringUnavailableAvailable
Published commercial pricingUnavailableAvailable
Enterprise SSO/audit loggingNot documentedAvailable

AI & Agent Features

FeatureDgraphSurrealDB
Built-in agent memory systemUnavailableAvailable
Vector searchNot documentedAvailable
Hybrid RAG toolingUnavailableAvailable

Pricing Compared

Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.

Dgraph

Open Source (self-hosted) — Free N/A
Dgraph Cloud Free — Free N/A
Dgraph Cloud Shared — $39.99/month per backend Monthly
Dgraph Cloud Dedicated — From $199/month Monthly

SurrealDB

Self-Hosted — Free N/A
Start (Cloud) — Free instance, then from $0.021/hr usage-based
Scale (Cloud) — From $0.192/node/hr usage-based
Enterprise — Custom custom

Pros & Cons

Dgraph

Pros

  • Free and open-source core with no licensing cost for self-hosting
  • Natively distributed architecture scales linearly with added nodes
  • First-class GraphQL support simplifies application development
  • Strong open-source community with an active GitHub project

Cons

  • Ownership changes (Hypermode acquisition in 2023, Istari Digital in 2025) create uncertainty about long-term commercial roadmap
  • Smaller ecosystem and talent pool compared to Neo4j
  • Managed Cloud pricing can add up for high-data-transfer workloads
  • Steeper learning curve for teams unfamiliar with graph query languages

SurrealDB

Pros

  • Replaces multiple specialized databases with a single multi-model engine
  • Flexible deployment options from embedded to fully managed cloud
  • Free tier and free self-hosted use for prototyping and small projects
  • Well-funded with backing from established venture investors
  • Native vector search suited to modern AI application needs

Cons

  • Newer database with a shorter production track record than established systems
  • Some advanced cloud features like branching and forking are still rolling out
  • SurrealQL requires learning a new query language distinct from standard SQL
  • Source-available licensing terms may require review for some enterprise use cases
  • Smaller ecosystem of third-party tools and integrations compared to legacy databases

Use Cases

Choose Dgraph: Teams that specifically need a graph database with native GraphQL access, are comfortable self-hosting under Apache 2.0, and don't require a vendor-managed cloud or published SLA.
Choose SurrealDB: Teams that want to consolidate document, graph, vector, and relational workloads into one engine, need AI/RAG-oriented features like agent memory and knowledge graphs, and want the option of an hourly-billed managed cloud or a custom Enterprise plan with SSO and audit logging.
Need both: Organizations already running a graph-only workload on Dgraph that are separately evaluating SurrealDB for a new AI/RAG or multi-model project may end up operating both rather than migrating existing graph data.

Dgraph

  • Knowledge graph applications — Teams model deeply interconnected entities and relationships that are cumbersome to query with SQL joins.
  • Recommendation and social graph systems — Applications that need fast traversal of user, content, and interaction relationships use Dgraph for low-latency graph queries.
  • Managed graph database hosting — Teams that want graph database capability without operating infrastructure use Dgraph Cloud's shared or dedicated tiers.

SurrealDB

  • Unified data layer for serverless apps — Startups use SurrealDB as a single database for document, relational, and graph data in serverless and JAMstack applications.
  • AI and retrieval-augmented generation — AI teams combine vector search with relational and graph data in one engine for RAG and semantic search pipelines.
  • Database consolidation for enterprises — Enterprises use SurrealDB to reduce the number of specialized databases they operate and maintain.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Dgraph free to use?

Yes, Dgraph is released under the Apache 2.0 open-source license and can be self-hosted at no cost, though no commercial pricing or managed cloud is currently documented.

Does SurrealDB have a free tier?

Yes, the Start plan includes one free instance and 1GB of storage forever, plus a no-signup sandbox.

Does Dgraph support GraphQL?

Yes, it offers a native GraphQL API in addition to direct property-graph database access.

What data models does SurrealDB support?

It unifies document, graph, vector, time-series, and relational data models in one engine with ACID transactions.

Who owns Dgraph now?

Dgraph originated at Dgraph Labs, which was acquired by Hypermode, later acquired by Istari Digital; the open-source project continues under this lineage.

Is there a SurrealDB Enterprise plan?

Yes, it offers self-hosted deployment, audit logging, SSO, and SLA-backed uptime, with custom pricing.

Read the full Dgraph review · Read the full SurrealDB review