Compare fieldloops and Formspark on pricing, features, platforms, and ratings — both Forms tools, Freemium — free plan, plus Pro ($49/year) and Agency…
At a Glance
fieldloops
Formspark
Primary category
Forms
Forms
Rating
Not documented
Not documented
Pricing model
Freemium — free plan, plus Pro ($49/year) and Agency ($149/year) annual subscription tiers
Freemium (pay-as-you-go submission bundles, no recurring subscription)
Starting price
Not documented
Free (250 submissions); paid bundles from $25 per 50,000 submissions
Free plan
Yes
Yes
Free trial
Not documented
Not documented
Platforms
Not documented
Web
Team collaboration
Not documented
Not documented
AI features
Not documented
Not documented
Public API
Not documented
Yes
Pricing Compared
Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.
fieldloops
No individual plan breakdown documented yet.
Formspark
Free — $0 Free forever
Submission Bundle — $25 per 50,000 submissions (discounted from $50) One-time purchase, does not expire
Pros & Cons
fieldloops
Pros
Free tier available with no account required, so teams can try the core repeater functionality before paying.
Pro and Agency tiers add conditional logic, row calculations, and REST API v2 access for more advanced Gravity Forms workflows.
Paid plans include a 14-day money-back guarantee, lowering the risk of trying Pro or Agency.
Agency tier explicitly supports multi-site deployment, which suits WordPress agencies managing repeater fields across many client sites.
Cons
Requires an active Gravity Forms installation — it's an add-on, not a standalone forms product.
Conditional logic, row calculations, and REST API access are gated behind the paid Pro and Agency tiers.
Row groups are capped at 50 rows per the vendor's own stated limit, which may not fit very large datasets.
Formspark
Pros
Submission bundles never expire, so businesses only pay for capacity they actually use
Extremely fast setup that works with any static site generator or front-end framework
Unlimited team members included on every plan, including the free tier
Simple, predictable pricing without a recurring subscription commitment
Cons
No visual, drag-and-drop form builder; developers must write their own HTML
Limited built-in analytics or reporting compared to full-featured form platforms
Smaller integration ecosystem than larger competitors like Formstack or Typeform
Very small company size may concern buyers evaluating long-term vendor support and reliability
Use Cases
fieldloops
Formspark
Static site contact forms — Developers add a working contact form to a static marketing site or portfolio without provisioning any backend infrastructure.
Lead-generation landing pages — Marketing agencies and small businesses collect leads from campaign landing pages and route them straight to email or a CRM via webhook.
Waitlist and signup forms — Indie developers and early-stage startups capture waitlist signups for a new product launch without building custom signup infrastructure.