Format vs Framer

Compare Format and Framer on pricing, features, platforms, and ratings — both Website Builders tools, Subscription vs Freemium (subscription tiers with a free…

At a Glance

 FormatFramer
Primary categoryWebsite BuildersWebsite Builders
RatingNot documentedNot documented
Pricing modelSubscriptionFreemium (subscription tiers with a free plan)
Starting price$14/month (or $10/month billed annually)Free (paid plans from $10/month)
Free planNot documentedYes
Free trialYesNot documented
PlatformsWeb, iOSWeb
Team collaborationNot documentedNot documented
AI featuresNot documentedYes
Public APINot documentedNot documented

Pricing Compared

Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.

Format

Basic — $14/month ($10/month billed annually) monthly or annual
Pro — $24/month ($12/month billed annually) monthly or annual
Pro Plus — $36/month ($15/month billed annually) monthly or annual

Framer

Free — $0 Free forever
Basic — $10/month Monthly or annual
Pro — $30/month Monthly or annual
Enterprise — Custom pricing Annual contract

Pros & Cons

Format

Pros

  • Commission-free store means photographers keep 100 percent of print and product sale revenue on paid plans
  • Deep photography-specific workflow integration via Adobe Lightroom sync
  • Client proofing galleries are built into every plan rather than sold as an add-on
  • More than a decade of operating history and a large template library aimed specifically at visual portfolios
  • Annual billing offers a substantial discount versus month-to-month pricing

Cons

  • Higher standard monthly pricing than some general-purpose website builders if not committing to an annual plan
  • Feature set is narrowly focused on photography and visual portfolios, less suited to non-visual small businesses
  • Lower-tier Basic plan has meaningful limits on page count, images, and client galleries
  • Now owned by Zenfolio, which could eventually affect long-term product direction or brand independence

Framer

Pros

  • Exceptional visual design freedom and interaction design tools compared to most no-code website builders
  • Generous free plan supports up to 1,000 pages and a full CMS for evaluation before paying
  • Renders real production code, resulting in fast-loading published sites rather than a heavier abstraction layer
  • Rapid recent investment in AI-assisted site generation speeds up the design process

Cons

  • Smaller third-party plugin, integration, and template ecosystem than WordPress
  • E-commerce features are less mature than dedicated platforms or longer-established competitors like Webflow
  • Add-on costs for extra editors, advanced hosting, and A/B testing can increase total cost for larger teams
  • Enterprise pricing is fully custom, requiring a sales conversation rather than transparent published pricing

Use Cases

Format

  • Building a professional photography portfolio — Photographers use Format's templates and Lightroom integration to publish a polished, image-heavy portfolio site quickly.
  • Client proofing and print sales — Photographers share proofing galleries with clients for selection, then sell prints and digital downloads through Format's commission-free store.
  • Showcasing visual creative work beyond photography — Designers and illustrators use Format's portfolio themes to present visual work with a similarly image-focused layout.

Framer

  • Startup and company websites — Startups design and publish their primary marketing website without hiring a developer, a workflow used by a large share of a recent Y Combinator batch.
  • Designer portfolios — Individual designers build visually rich, interactive portfolio sites that showcase design work directly in the browser.
  • Agency client website delivery — Design agencies build and hand off client websites using Framer's CMS and staging environment for structured collaboration.

Read the full Format review · Read the full Framer review