Compare Grip and Zuddl on pricing, features, platforms, and ratings — both Video Conferencing tools, Enterprise subscription, custom quote-based vs custom…
At a Glance
Grip
Zuddl
Primary category
Video Conferencing
Video Conferencing
Rating
Not documented
Not documented
Pricing model
Enterprise subscription, custom quote-based
custom
Starting price
Custom pricing (no published starting price)
Custom pricing based on event format and attendee volume
Free plan
Not documented
Not documented
Free trial
Not documented
Not documented
Platforms
Web, iOS, Android
Web
Team collaboration
Not documented
Not documented
AI features
Yes
Yes
Public API
Yes
Not documented
Pricing Compared
Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.
Grip
Engagement — Custom quote Custom, per-event or annual
Management — Custom quote Custom, per-event or annual
Onsite — Custom quote Custom, per-event or annual
Zuddl
Webinar — Approximately 10,000 dollars per year (estimated) annual
Conferences — Approximately 12,000 dollars per year (estimated) annual
Custom / Enterprise — Custom annual
Pros & Cons
Grip
Pros
AI matchmaking engine is a mature, well-regarded core differentiator built over a decade
Strong roster of marquee enterprise event customers including Money 20/20 and Messe Frankfurt
Modular platform covers engagement, full event management and onsite hardware in one system
Supports a wide range of meeting formats beyond simple one-to-one networking
Cons
No published pricing; every deal requires a sales conversation and custom quote
Built primarily for large enterprise events, which may be overkill or unaffordable for small event organizers
Feature depth can require significant setup and configuration ahead of an event
Zuddl
Pros
Broadcast-quality Studio production without needing external production teams
Strong bi-directional CRM integration ties events directly to pipeline reporting
Scales from small webinars to conferences with tens of thousands of attendees
Modular platform covers virtual, hybrid, and in-person formats in one system
AI-powered matchmaking supports more meaningful attendee networking
Cons
No public self-serve pricing; requires a custom sales quote
Reported starting costs (thousands of dollars per year) may be out of reach for very small organizations
As a newer company (founded 2020), it has a smaller track record than legacy event platforms
Advanced production and CRM features likely require higher-tier plans not detailed publicly
Use Cases
Grip
Trade show attendee-exhibitor matchmaking — Using AI to connect trade show attendees with the most relevant exhibitors and sponsors automatically.
Hybrid and virtual conference engagement — Running networking, sessions and matchmaking for attendees participating both in person and remotely.
Investor and hosted buyer meetings — Structuring dedicated investor meeting or hosted buyer programs with AI-recommended, scheduled one-to-one sessions.
Zuddl
Large-scale B2B conferences — Organizers run multi-day conferences with thousands of attendees, combining live production with exhibitor booths and networking.
Pipeline-driven webinars — Marketing teams run webinar programs that sync attendee data directly into CRM and marketing automation for lead scoring.
Hybrid field events — Organizations combine in-person attendance with a virtual audience for regional field events and user conferences.