Compare Hyperproof and Conjur on pricing, features, platforms, and ratings — both Security tools, Enterprise / Custom quote vs Free/Open Source (core);…
At a Glance
Hyperproof
Conjur
Primary category
Security
Security
Rating
Not documented
Not documented
Pricing model
Enterprise / Custom quote
Free/Open Source (core); commercial tier via CyberArk Secrets Manager
Starting price
Custom pricing
Free (open source); commercial pricing is custom/quote-based
Free plan
Not documented
Not documented
Free trial
Not documented
Not documented
Platforms
Web
Not documented
Team collaboration
Not documented
Not documented
AI features
Yes
Not documented
Public API
Yes
Yes
Pricing Compared
Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.
Hyperproof
Professional — Custom (est. from ~$12,000/year) Annual
Strong cross-framework control mapping reduces duplicate evidence-gathering work for organizations managing multiple certifications.
Combines compliance management and risk and vendor management in a single platform rather than requiring separate tools.
Deep integrations with major cloud and identity providers automate much of the manual evidence-chasing.
Well capitalized with over $77 million raised, suggesting continued product investment.
Strong reported customer satisfaction around automation and customer support in third-party reviews.
Cons
Pricing is not published and requires a sales conversation, making it harder to budget upfront.
No free trial and a mandatory implementation fee add to the upfront cost.
Some users report the interface feels overwhelming, particularly when drilling into control mappings or risk modules.
Median contract value, reported around $40,000 per year, puts it out of reach for very small startups.
Newer modules like UAR and AI features are still maturing relative to core compliance workflows.
Conjur
Pros
Free, open-source core with an enterprise-grade security model
Strong policy-as-code approach to machine identity and access control
Deep integrations across common DevOps and cloud toolchains
Backed by CyberArk's established security expertise
Cons
Steeper learning curve (Ruby-based, MAML policy language) than simpler tools like HashiCorp Vault or Doppler
Open-source edition lacks the high-availability clustering and disaster recovery in the commercial tier
Smaller open-source community (under 1,000 GitHub stars) than competing secrets managers
Commercial pricing is quote-based and enterprise-oriented, less accessible to small teams
Use Cases
Hyperproof
Multi-framework compliance management — Security and compliance teams managing SOC 2, ISO 27001 and other certifications simultaneously use Hyperproof to map shared controls and avoid duplicate evidence collection.
Vendor and third-party risk assessment — Procurement and security teams assess and continuously monitor the risk posture of vendors and suppliers through Hyperproof's Mitigate module.
Continuous audit readiness — Organizations preparing for recurring external audits use Hyperproof to keep evidence current year-round instead of scrambling before each audit cycle.
Conjur
Machine Identity & Secrets Management for DevOps Pipelines — Platform and security teams use Conjur to secure credentials used by CI/CD tools and automated deployments.
Centralized Secrets Inside a PAM Program — Large enterprises embed Conjur's policy-driven access model into a broader privileged access management strategy.