Compare Hyperproof and guardsix on pricing, features, platforms, and ratings — both Security tools, Enterprise / Custom quote vs Guardsix does not publish…
At a Glance
Hyperproof
guardsix
Primary category
Security
Security
Rating
Not documented
Not documented
Pricing model
Enterprise / Custom quote
Guardsix does not publish specific pricing tiers or numbers on its website. It markets 'predictable pricing' as an alternative to competitors' ingestion-based (data-volume) SIEM pricing, but exact costs require contacting sales.
Starting price
Custom pricing
Not documented
Free plan
Not documented
Not documented
Free trial
Not documented
Not documented
Platforms
Web
Not documented
Team collaboration
Not documented
Not documented
AI features
Yes
Not documented
Public API
Yes
Not documented
Pricing Compared
Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.
Hyperproof
Professional — Custom (est. from ~$12,000/year) Annual
Business — Custom pricing Annual
Enterprise — Custom pricing Annual
guardsix
No individual plan breakdown documented yet.
Pros & Cons
Hyperproof
Pros
Strong cross-framework control mapping reduces duplicate evidence-gathering work for organizations managing multiple certifications.
Combines compliance management and risk and vendor management in a single platform rather than requiring separate tools.
Deep integrations with major cloud and identity providers automate much of the manual evidence-chasing.
Well capitalized with over $77 million raised, suggesting continued product investment.
Strong reported customer satisfaction around automation and customer support in third-party reviews.
Cons
Pricing is not published and requires a sales conversation, making it harder to budget upfront.
No free trial and a mandatory implementation fee add to the upfront cost.
Some users report the interface feels overwhelming, particularly when drilling into control mappings or risk modules.
Median contract value, reported around $40,000 per year, puts it out of reach for very small startups.
Newer modules like UAR and AI features are still maturing relative to core compliance workflows.
guardsix
Pros
Consolidates SIEM, NDR, SOAR, Fleet, and Governance into one platform instead of stitching together point tools
Strong focus on EU data sovereignty with on-premises/local deployment options
Integrates with widely used security and cloud vendors (Palo Alto, Cisco, CyberArk, Rapid7, Qualys, AWS, Google Cloud, Oracle) without requiring customers to replace existing tooling
Deep cybersecurity pedigree via its Logpoint heritage, including acquired SOAR/XDR (SecBI) and AI-driven NDR (Muninn) technology
Markets predictable, non-ingestion-based pricing, addressing a common pain point with traditional SIEM cost models
Cons
No public pricing is disclosed, making it hard to evaluate cost without contacting sales
Recent rebrand (March 2026) from Logpoint may cause brand-recognition confusion during the transition period
Enterprise-grade SIEM/NDR/SOAR platform is likely overkill and cost-prohibitive for small businesses without dedicated security staff
Marketing is squarely aimed at Europe/critical infrastructure, so fit for non-European or non-regulated organizations is less clear
Use Cases
Hyperproof
Multi-framework compliance management — Security and compliance teams managing SOC 2, ISO 27001 and other certifications simultaneously use Hyperproof to map shared controls and avoid duplicate evidence collection.
Vendor and third-party risk assessment — Procurement and security teams assess and continuously monitor the risk posture of vendors and suppliers through Hyperproof's Mitigate module.
Continuous audit readiness — Organizations preparing for recurring external audits use Hyperproof to keep evidence current year-round instead of scrambling before each audit cycle.