Mathesar and Teable both put a spreadsheet-style interface over PostgreSQL, but they solve different problems: Mathesar is a 100% GPLv3, nonprofit-maintained…
| Mathesar | Teable | |
|---|---|---|
| Primary category | No-Code | No-Code |
| Rating | Not documented | Not documented |
| Pricing model | Open Source | freemium |
| Starting price | Free (self-hosted); free tier available in early-beta Mathesar Cloud | Free (Pro from $10/seat/month) |
| Free plan | Not documented | Yes |
| Free trial | Not documented | Not documented |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Team collaboration | Not documented | Not documented |
| AI features | Not documented | Yes |
| Public API | Not documented | Yes |
Relationship to Postgres
Mathesar: Mathesar is explicitly a UI layer that connects to and operates directly on an existing PostgreSQL database using Postgres's native schemas and permissions.
Teable: Teable is also Postgres-backed, but functions as a standalone no-code platform with its own accounts, seats, and credit system rather than requiring you to bring an existing database.
Teams with an existing production database need a tool that respects that schema and permission model rather than duplicating data into a new system.
Pricing Structure
Mathesar: Mathesar has no pricing tiers documented at all — it's entirely free with no paid plans.
Teable: Teable is freemium: Free (1,000 rows, 1GB attachments), Pro ($10/seat/month annual), Business ($20/seat/month annual), plus a proprietary Enterprise Edition.
Budget-constrained teams need to know whether a tool has any recurring cost at all versus one that scales with seats and usage.
Maturity & Release Status
Mathesar: Mathesar is in Public Beta and has not reached a stable 1.0 release, per its own documentation, though it describes itself as stable enough for production.
Teable: Teable's facts don't carry an equivalent beta caveat and instead document ISO 9001 and ISO 27001 certifications.
Risk-averse teams may weight formal certifications and release maturity differently when choosing infrastructure to depend on.
AI-Assisted Features
Mathesar: Mathesar's documented feature set (spreadsheet-like interface, forms, query builders, schema management) does not mention AI-assisted features.
Teable: Teable includes AI fields, AI chat, a natural-language app builder, and the CuppyClaw AI agent starting on its Free plan.
Teams wanting AI-assisted app or query building need a platform where that's a native feature, not a gap.
Governance
Mathesar: Mathesar is maintained by the nonprofit Mathesar Foundation, a 501(c)(3), with a 100% open-source GPLv3 codebase and no proprietary edition.
Teable: Teable splits into an AGPL-3.0 Community Edition and a separate proprietary Enterprise Edition.
Organizations with open-source procurement policies may require a project with no proprietary components anywhere in its stack.
| Feature | Mathesar | Teable |
|---|---|---|
| Works directly on an existing (bring-your-own) Postgres database | Available | Not documented |
| Native Postgres permission model | Available | Not documented |
| Docker self-hosting | Available | Available |
| One-click deploy (Railway, Sealos, Zeabur) | Not documented | Available |
| Feature | Mathesar | Teable |
|---|---|---|
| Spreadsheet-style grid interface | Available | Available |
| Kanban/Gallery/Calendar views | Not documented | Available |
| Forms for data collection | Available | Available |
| AI fields, AI chat, and app builder | Not documented | Available |
| Feature | Mathesar | Teable |
|---|---|---|
| Fully open source with no proprietary edition | Available | Limited |
| Free plan/tier available | Available | Available |
| Stated stable (non-beta) release status | Limited | Not documented |
| Paid enterprise tier | Unavailable | Available |
Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.
Pros
Cons
Pros
Cons
Yes for Mathesar — it's a UI layer that connects to and operates directly on an existing Postgres database. Teable manages its own Postgres backend as part of the platform rather than requiring you to bring one.
Mathesar is completely free with no pricing tiers documented at all. Teable is freemium, with a Free plan and paid Pro, Business, and Enterprise tiers.
Mathesar describes itself as in Public Beta and not yet at a stable 1.0 release, though it says it's stable enough for production use. Teable's facts don't include an equivalent beta caveat and instead cite ISO 9001 and ISO 27001 certifications.
Teable does, with AI fields, AI chat, a natural-language app builder, and the CuppyClaw AI agent from the Free plan. Mathesar's documented features (spreadsheet interface, forms, query builders) don't include AI-assisted capabilities.
Both rely on PostgreSQL, but Teable documents explicit row ceilings by plan (up to 1,000,000 rows on Business), while Mathesar's scalability is described as following PostgreSQL's own capabilities without stated row limits since it operates on your existing database.
Mathesar is 100% GPLv3 with no proprietary tier, maintained by the nonprofit Mathesar Foundation. Teable's Community Edition is AGPL-3.0, but its Enterprise Edition is proprietary.