Compare MiroTalk P2P and Zuddl on pricing, features, platforms, and ratings — both Video Conferencing tools, Open Source vs custom pricing to decide which…
At a Glance
MiroTalk P2P
Zuddl
Primary category
Video Conferencing
Video Conferencing
Rating
Not documented
Not documented
Pricing model
Open Source
custom
Starting price
Free
Custom pricing based on event format and attendee volume
Free plan
Not documented
Not documented
Free trial
Not documented
Not documented
Platforms
Web
Web
Team collaboration
Not documented
Not documented
AI features
Yes
Yes
Public API
Yes
Not documented
Pricing Compared
Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.
MiroTalk P2P
Open Source (Self-Hosted) — Free N/A
Zuddl
Webinar — Approximately 10,000 dollars per year (estimated) annual
Conferences — Approximately 12,000 dollars per year (estimated) annual
Custom / Enterprise — Custom annual
Pros & Cons
MiroTalk P2P
Pros
Free and open source under AGPLv3
Low-latency peer-to-peer calls with no central media server
Peer-to-peer architecture scales poorly beyond small groups compared to SFU-based tools
No official managed hosting or enterprise SLA from the core project
Requires server setup and maintenance knowledge to self-host
Community-driven support rather than dedicated customer service
Large groups should use MiroTalk SFU instead, adding a decision step for new users
Zuddl
Pros
Broadcast-quality Studio production without needing external production teams
Strong bi-directional CRM integration ties events directly to pipeline reporting
Scales from small webinars to conferences with tens of thousands of attendees
Modular platform covers virtual, hybrid, and in-person formats in one system
AI-powered matchmaking supports more meaningful attendee networking
Cons
No public self-serve pricing; requires a custom sales quote
Reported starting costs (thousands of dollars per year) may be out of reach for very small organizations
As a newer company (founded 2020), it has a smaller track record than legacy event platforms
Advanced production and CRM features likely require higher-tier plans not detailed publicly
Use Cases
MiroTalk P2P
Small team meetings — Teams that want a free, self-hosted Zoom alternative for quick calls with chat and screen sharing.
Client presentations — Consultants and freelancers sharing screens and whiteboards with a small number of clients.
Privacy-focused organizations — Groups that need full control over where call data is processed and stored by self-hosting their own instance.
Zuddl
Large-scale B2B conferences — Organizers run multi-day conferences with thousands of attendees, combining live production with exhibitor booths and networking.
Pipeline-driven webinars — Marketing teams run webinar programs that sync attendee data directly into CRM and marketing automation for lead scoring.
Hybrid field events — Organizations combine in-person attendance with a virtual audience for regional field events and user conferences.