Compare OpenKM and Scrive on pricing, features, platforms, and ratings — both Documents & E-signature tools, Freemium vs Custom, quote-based pricing (contact…
At a Glance
OpenKM
Scrive
Primary category
Documents & E-signature
Documents & E-signature
Rating
Not documented
Not documented
Pricing model
Freemium
Custom, quote-based pricing (contact sales)
Starting price
Free (Community Edition); Professional and Cloud plans are custom-quoted, with third-party estimates starting around $30/user/month
Custom pricing; contact sales
Free plan
Yes
Not documented
Free trial
Not documented
Yes
Platforms
Web
Web
Team collaboration
Not documented
Not documented
AI features
Not documented
Yes
Public API
Yes
Yes
Pricing Compared
Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.
OpenKM
Community Edition — Free N/A
Professional Edition — Custom (estimated from around $30/user/month) Monthly or annual
Cloud Edition — Custom quote Monthly or annual
Scrive
eSign Online — Custom pricing contact sales
eSign API — Custom pricing contact sales, often per-transaction
eSign GO — Custom pricing contact sales
eID Hub and ID Check — Custom pricing contact sales
Pros & Cons
OpenKM
Pros
Free, open-source Community Edition available for self-hosting
Strong workflow and business process automation via jBPM
Purpose-built records management features for compliance-heavy industries
Scales from small teams to large enterprise deployments
International presence with localized support in multiple regions
Cons
Professional and Cloud pricing is not published and requires a sales quote
Community Edition has no official vendor support, only forums
Admin interface feels dated compared to newer cloud-native DMS tools
Workflow configuration has a learning curve for non-technical users
Smaller third-party app marketplace than mainstream competitors like Box
Scrive
Pros
Strong European eID and eIDAS compliance focus
Combines e-signature and identity verification in one platform
High transaction scale reported, over 100 million per year
Flexible deployment through portal, API, or managed service
Established company with over a decade in the market
Cons
No public self-serve pricing, requires contacting sales
Primarily optimized for European and Nordic markets
Onboarding and API integration can require technical work
Per-transaction cost model can be harder to predict at scale
Smaller brand recognition outside Europe compared to global competitors
Use Cases
OpenKM
Legal and compliance document management — Law firms and compliance teams use OpenKM's records management and audit features to manage sensitive documents.
Enterprise records management — Large organizations use OpenKM to enforce retention schedules and regulatory document lifecycles across departments.
Educational institution document control — Universities and schools use OpenKM to manage administrative records, student files, and institutional documents.
Scrive
Banking and financial services agreements — Banks and fintechs use Scrive to combine e-signature with strong eID identity verification for regulated agreements.
HR and employment contract signing — HR teams and staffing agencies sign employment contracts and onboarding documents digitally with full audit trails.
Real estate and telecom contract workflows — Real estate, telecom, and public sector organizations process high volumes of signed agreements through Scrive's API and forms.