Pinpoint vs Gem
Compare Pinpoint and Gem on pricing, features, platforms, and ratings — both Recruitment tools, Custom pricing to decide which fits your team.
At a Glance
| | Pinpoint | Gem |
| Primary category | Recruitment | Recruitment |
| Rating | Not documented | Not documented |
| Pricing model | Custom | Custom |
| Starting price | Custom (contact sales) | $130/month (startup tier, 1-10 employees) |
| Free plan | Not documented | Not documented |
| Free trial | Not documented | Not documented |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Team collaboration | Not documented | Not documented |
| AI features | Yes | Yes |
| Public API | Not documented | Yes |
Pricing Compared
Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.
Pinpoint
Custom — Custom (contact sales) annual
Gem
Startup — $130/month (discounted from $270/month) Monthly, 10% discount if billed annually
Standard Seat — Custom pricing Annual contract, per seat
AI-Powered Seat — Custom pricing Annual contract, per seat
Enterprise — Contact for pricing Custom annual contract
Pros & Cons
Pinpoint
Pros
- Strong built-in employer branding and career site tools, not just an ATS
- GDPR-native design suits UK and EU-based hiring teams
- Faster implementation than many enterprise ATS platforms
- Structured scorecards support fairer, more consistent hiring decisions
- Positioned as a more affordable mid-market alternative to Greenhouse and Lever
Cons
- No public pricing; requires a sales conversation for a quote
- Smaller ecosystem and integration marketplace than Greenhouse or Lever
- Less brand recognition in the US market compared to larger competitors
- May be less feature-rich than Greenhouse for very large, complex enterprise hiring operations
- Best suited to mid-market teams; may be over- or under-featured at the extremes of company size
Gem
Pros
- Deep integration with LinkedIn Recruiter, Gmail and Outlook streamlines sourcing workflows
- Strong analytics and benchmarking for measuring recruiting performance
- Flexible deployment; can sit alongside an existing ATS or replace it entirely
- Well-funded (148 million dollars raised) with enterprise customers like Wayfair, Dropbox, Cisco and DoorDash
- Discounted startup pricing tier lowers the barrier for small companies
Cons
- Full pricing is largely custom and quote-based rather than transparent for larger teams
- AI-powered features require a separate, likely pricier seat tier on top of standard seats
- Can be more sourcing and CRM-focused than some all-in-one competitors like Ashby
- Best value is realized at scale, so very small non-startup teams may find it costly relative to lighter tools
Use Cases
Pinpoint
- Centralized in-house hiring — In-house talent acquisition teams centralize career sites, applications and hiring workflow in one platform.
- GDPR-compliant hiring in Europe — UK and EU companies use Pinpoint's GDPR-native data handling for compliant applicant tracking.
- Scaling mid-market hiring — Mid-market companies scale hiring volume without heavy IT or HR operations overhead.
Gem
- Proactive candidate sourcing at scale — Helps recruiters build and manage large outbound sourcing pipelines with CRM-style tracking.
- Recruiting analytics and forecasting — Gives talent acquisition leadership visibility into pipeline health, forecasts and benchmarks.
- Lean startup hiring — Provides discounted access to sourcing, ATS and analytics tools for early-stage companies.
Read the full Pinpoint review · Read the full Gem review