Compare SeaTable and Softr on pricing, features, platforms, and ratings — both No-Code tools, Freemium SaaS with per-user paid tiers, plus on-premises server…
At a Glance
SeaTable
Softr
Primary category
No-Code
No-Code
Rating
Not documented
Not documented
Pricing model
Freemium SaaS with per-user paid tiers, plus on-premises server licenses
freemium
Starting price
Free for up to 25 users; Plus plan from 7 euros per user per month, billed annually
Free (paid plans from $49/month)
Free plan
Yes
Yes
Free trial
Not documented
Not documented
Platforms
Web
Web
Team collaboration
Not documented
Not documented
AI features
Yes
Not documented
Public API
Yes
Not documented
Pricing Compared
Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.
SeaTable
Free — 0 euros N/A
Plus — 7 euros per user per month (annual) or 9 euros per user per month (monthly) Monthly or annual
Enterprise — 14 euros per user per month (annual) or 18 euros per user per month (monthly) Monthly or annual
Dedicated Cloud — Custom quote Contact sales
Softr
Free — $0/month Monthly
Basic — $49/month Monthly or $588/year
Professional — $139/month Monthly or $1,668/year
Business — $269/month Monthly or $3,228/year
Enterprise — Custom Annual contract
Pros & Cons
SeaTable
Pros
Free plan supports up to 25 users, generous for small teams compared to many no-code competitors
Strong data residency positioning with cloud data stored exclusively in German data centers
On-premises server licenses available for organizations that need full self-hosting control
Python scripting allows more advanced customization than a purely no-code interface
Transparent, published per-user pricing for Free, Plus, and Enterprise tiers
Cons
Free plan row and storage limits (10,000 rows, 2 gigabytes) are modest for larger datasets
SAML single sign-on is reserved for the Enterprise tier
Dedicated Cloud plan requires a minimum of 100 users, out of reach for smaller organizations
Smaller ecosystem of templates and integrations compared to larger no-code competitors like Airtable
AI credit allowances on lower tiers are limited (12.5 to 50 credits) for AI-assisted features
Softr
Pros
Fast way to launch functional apps from existing spreadsheets or databases without hiring developers
AI co-builder speeds up initial app creation from a text prompt
Wide range of data source integrations, including Airtable, HubSpot, and SQL databases
Free plan is generous enough to fully test the platform before paying
Built-in authentication, permissions, and payments reduce the need for third-party tools
Cons
Pricing scales quickly with app users and AI credits, which can get expensive for larger portals
Complex custom logic still requires writing custom code or workarounds
Performance can depend on the connected data source, especially with large Airtable bases
Some advanced data sources like BigQuery and PostgreSQL are limited to higher-tier plans
Use Cases
SeaTable
GDPR-compliant project and data management — European organizations with strict data residency requirements use SeaTable Cloud because data is stored exclusively in German data centers.
Self-hosted internal database applications — IT teams deploy SeaTable Server on-premises to build internal no-code database applications while keeping full control of infrastructure.
Small team workflow and data tracking — Small teams of up to 25 users use SeaTable's Free plan to build custom tables and automations for tracking projects, inventory, or contacts.
Softr
Client Portals — Agencies and service businesses give clients a branded portal to view project status, invoices, or shared files sourced from Airtable or a database.
Internal Tools and Dashboards — Operations teams build internal dashboards and admin tools on top of existing spreadsheets or databases without waiting on engineering resources.
Directories and Marketplaces — Startups launch searchable directories or two-sided marketplaces quickly using Softr's directory templates and built-in payments.