Grip vs Sched

Compare Grip and Sched on pricing, features, platforms, and ratings — both Video Conferencing tools, Enterprise subscription, custom quote-based vs Annual…

At a Glance

 GripSched
Primary categoryVideo ConferencingVideo Conferencing
RatingNot documentedNot documented
Pricing modelEnterprise subscription, custom quote-basedAnnual subscription tiers plus a free plan for small events
Starting priceCustom pricing (no published starting price)Launch plan from about $600/year
Free planNot documentedYes
Free trialNot documentedYes
PlatformsWeb, iOS, AndroidWeb
Team collaborationNot documentedNot documented
AI featuresYesYes
Public APIYesNot documented

Pricing Compared

Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.

Grip

Engagement — Custom quote Custom, per-event or annual
Management — Custom quote Custom, per-event or annual
Onsite — Custom quote Custom, per-event or annual

Sched

Launch — About $600/year annual
Boost — About $1,500/year annual
Ultra — About $3,900/year annual
Enterprise — Custom annual

Pros & Cons

Grip

Pros

  • AI matchmaking engine is a mature, well-regarded core differentiator built over a decade
  • Strong roster of marquee enterprise event customers including Money 20/20 and Messe Frankfurt
  • Modular platform covers engagement, full event management and onsite hardware in one system
  • Supports a wide range of meeting formats beyond simple one-to-one networking

Cons

  • No published pricing; every deal requires a sales conversation and custom quote
  • Built primarily for large enterprise events, which may be overkill or unaffordable for small event organizers
  • Onsite hardware tools add logistical complexity compared to purely software-based competitors
  • Feature depth can require significant setup and configuration ahead of an event

Sched

Pros

  • Purpose-built for multi-track conferences and event agendas rather than generic scheduling
  • Personalized attendee scheduling app improves the on-site experience
  • Sponsor and lead retrieval tools support event monetization
  • Discounts available for nonprofits, education, government, and startups
  • Free or low-cost options for smaller events under about 50 attendees

Cons

  • Pricing is structured as annual plans, which can be a larger upfront commitment than monthly SaaS tools
  • Advanced features like custom reporting and priority support are reserved for the top Ultra tier
  • Enterprise features such as on-premise hosting require custom sales conversations
  • Less suited to simple one-on-one appointment scheduling than dedicated booking tools

Use Cases

Grip

  • Trade show attendee-exhibitor matchmaking — Using AI to connect trade show attendees with the most relevant exhibitors and sponsors automatically.
  • Hybrid and virtual conference engagement — Running networking, sessions and matchmaking for attendees participating both in person and remotely.
  • Investor and hosted buyer meetings — Structuring dedicated investor meeting or hosted buyer programs with AI-recommended, scheduled one-to-one sessions.

Sched

  • Multi-track conference scheduling — Organizers publish a full multi-day, multi-track agenda and let attendees build personalized schedules across sessions.
  • Sponsor and exhibitor lead capture — Sponsors and exhibitors use Sched's lead retrieval tools to capture and follow up with engaged attendees.
  • Speaker and session management — Event teams collect speaker submissions through call-for-papers workflows and publish speaker profile pages.

Read the full Grip review · Read the full Sched review